Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38409466›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Optimizing grid-connected PV systems with novel super-twisting sliding mode controllers for real-time power management.

Bhabasis Mohapatra, Binod Kumar Sahu, Swagat Pati, Mohit Bajaj, Vojtech Blazek, Lukas Prokop, Stanislav Misak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Bhabasis MohapatraDepartment of Electrical Engineering, ITER, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Binod Kumar SahuDepartment of Electrical Engineering, ITER, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Swagat PatiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, ITER, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. swagatpati@soa.ac.in.
Mohit BajajDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun, 248002, India. thebestbajaj@gmail.com.
Vojtech BlazekENET Centre, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Lukas ProkopENET Centre, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Stanislav MisakENET Centre, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Siksha O Anusandhan University · INVSB - Technical University of Ostrava · CZAl-Ahliyya Amman University · JO

Funding

Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports TN02000025 National Centre for Energy IIMinistry of the Environment of the Czech Republic CZ.10.03.01/00/22_003/0000048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past years, the use of renewable energy sources (RESs) has grown significantly as a means of providing clean energy to counteract the devastating effects of climate change. Reducing energy costs and pollution have been the primary causes of the rise in solar photovoltaic (PV) system integrations with the grid in recent years. A load that is locally connected to a GCPV requires both active and reactive power control. In order to control both active and reactive power, MAs and advanced controllers are essential. Researchers have used one of the recently developed MAs, known as the CAOA, which is based on mathematical arithmetic operators to tackle a few real-world optimization problems. Some disadvantages of CAOA include its natural tendency to converge to a local optimum and its limited capacity for exploration. By merging the PSO and CAOA methodologies, this article suggests the IAOA. To show how applicable IAOA is, its performance has been evaluated using four benchmark functions. The implementation of an IAOA-based ST-SMC for active and reactive power control is addressed in this article, which offers an innovative approach of research. In comparison to PSO-based ST-SMC and CAOA-based ST-SMC, the proposed IAOA-based ST-SMC appears to be superior, with settling time for active and reactive power control at a minimum of 0.01012 s and 0.5075 s. A real-time OPAL-RT 4510 simulator is used to validate the performance results of a 40 kW GCPV system after it has been investigated in the MATLAB environment.

Indexed as

Conventional arithmetic optimization algorithm (CAOA)Grid connected photovoltaic system (GCPV)Improved arithmetic optimization algorithm (IAOA)Particle swarm optimization (PSO)Photovoltaic (PV)Proportional-integral (PI) controllerSuper twisting sliding mode controller (ST-SMC)

Identifiers

PMID38409466
PMCPMC10897222
OpenAlexW4392156890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.