ArticleScientific reports2024
Optimal cutoff value of the dry eye-related quality-of-life score for diagnosing dry eye disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Motugivatrep (SJP-0132) 0.3% Ophthalmic Suspension for Dry Eye Disease: A Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Phase 3 Trial.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Trial
- The Effect of Varenicline Nasal Spray on the Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease and Tear Film Stability: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- The effectiveness of 0.05% cyclosporine A combined with deproteinized calf blood extract eye gel in the treatment of dry eye disease after pterygium surgery.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Characteristics of the meibomian gland in a population without dry eye symptoms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Electronic device exposure and dry eye symptoms among medical and nonmedical Palestinian university students: a multicenter cross-sectional study of associated factors.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Dry eye-related tear biomarkers MMP-2, MMP-13, and IFN-γ: potential predictors of Type III acute acquired concomitant esotropia.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Evaluation of changes in objective visual quality based on tear film stability after SMILE surgery.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Utilizing Corneal Fluorescein and Conjunctival Lissamine Green Staining Combined with in vivo Confocal Microscopy for Grading the Severity of Dry Eye Disease.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Influencing factors of ocular pain in dry eye disease patients at high altitude.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This retrospective study aimed to determine the optimal cutoff values of the Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score (DEQS) questionnaire for diagnosing dry eye disease (DED) and classifying DED severities. Participants completed the DEQS questionnaire, the Japanese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (J-OSDI) questionnaire, and DED examinations. DED was diagnosed according to the 2016 Asia Dry Eye Society diagnostic criteria based on DED symptoms (J-OSDI ≥ 13 points) and tear film breakup time ≤ 5 s. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to calculate the optimal cutoff values of the DEQS summary score for detecting DED and grading its severity. Among 427 patients, 296 (69.3%) and 131 (30.7%) were diagnosed with DED and non-DED, respectively. ROC analysis determined an optimal cutoff value of 15.0 points for DED diagnosis, with 83.5% sensitivity, 87.0% specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.915. The positive and negative predictive values for DEQS ≥ 15.0 points were 93.6% and 69.9%, respectively. DEQS cutoff values of 15.0, 20.0, and 26.8 points could be accepted for severity classification of DED subjective symptoms in clinical use and represent mild, moderate, and severe DED, respectively. Conclusively, the optimal cutoff values of DEQS enable DED detection and subjective symptom severity classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.