ArticleBiological trace element research2024
Effects of Various Heavy Metal Exposures on Insulin Resistance in Non-diabetic Populations: Interpretability Analysis from Machine Learning Modeling Perspective.
Article in Biological trace element research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applications of Machine Learning in the Research of Heavy Metal(loid)s-Related Risk: A Scoping Review of Methodology.Toxics · 2026Review
- An Exploration of Machine Learning Methods in Human Biomonitoring.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Review
- Development, validation, and visualization of a machine learning-based predictive model for depression risk in sleep disorder patients.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Association of the dietary index for gut microbiota with metabolic syndrome and its components combining interpretable machine learning algorithms.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
- Machine learning-driven geochemical fingerprinting and risk characterization of mineral dust across different operational settings in El-Gedida Iron Mine, Egypt.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2025Article
- Geographical variations in metal exposure and metabolic disorders in Chile using an exposome approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Body mass index mediates the association between heavy metal exposure and overactive bladder risk: insights from a nationally representative cross-sectional study using explainable machine learning.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Integrated analysis of shared gene expression signatures and immune microenvironment heterogeneity in type 2 diabetes mellitus and colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Association between pollinosis and obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome in the US population: evidence from the NHANES database 2005-2018.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Association between urinary heavy metals and cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome: mediating roles of TyG, WWI, and eGFR.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Machine learning approaches to identify the link between heavy metal exposure and ischemic stroke using the US NHANES data from 2003 to 2018.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing and compelling evidence has been proved that heavy metal exposure is involved in the development of insulin resistance (IR). We trained an interpretable predictive machine learning (ML) model for IR in the non-diabetic populations based on levels of heavy metal exposure. A total of 4354 participants from the NHANES (2003-2020) with complete information were randomly divided into a training set and a test set. Twelve ML algorithms, including random forest (RF), XGBoost (XGB), logistic regression (LR), GaussianNB (GNB), ridge regression (RR), support vector machine (SVM), multilayer perceptron (MLP), decision tree (DT), AdaBoost (AB), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Voting Classifier (VC), and K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), were constructed for IR prediction using the training set. Among these models, the RF algorithm had the best predictive performance, showing an accuracy of 80.14%, an AUC of 0.856, and an F1 score of 0.74 in the test set. We embedded three interpretable methods, the permutation feature importance analysis, partial dependence plot (PDP), and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) in RF model for model interpretation. Urinary Ba, urinary Mo, blood Pb, and blood Cd levels were identified as the main influencers of IR. Within a specific range, urinary Ba (0.56-3.56 µg/L) and urinary Mo (1.06-20.25 µg/L) levels exhibited the most pronounced upwards trend with the risk of IR, while blood Pb (0.05-2.81 µg/dL) and blood Cd (0.24-0.65 µg/L) levels showed a declining trend with IR. The findings on the synergistic effects demonstrated that controlling urinary Ba levels might be more crucial for the management of IR. The SHAP decision plot offered personalized care for IR based on heavy metal control. In conclusion, by utilizing interpretable ML approaches, we emphasize the predictive value of heavy metals for IR, especially Ba, Mo, Pb, and Cd.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.