ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2024
Exploring subtypes of multiple sclerosis through unsupervised machine learning of automated fiber quantification.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning methods evaluation for identification of cognitive phenotypes in multiple sclerosis and their MRI correlates.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Illuminating radiogenomic signatures in pediatric-type diffuse gliomas: insights into molecular, clinical, and imaging correlations. Part I: high-grade group.La Radiologia medica · 2025Review
- Illuminating radiogenomic signatures in pediatric-type diffuse gliomas: insights into molecular, clinical, and imaging correlations. Part II: low-grade group.La Radiologia medica · 2025Review
- The Potential of cfDNA as Biomarker: Opportunities and Challenges for Neurodegenerative Diseases.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to subtype multiple sclerosis (MS) patients using unsupervised machine learning on white matter (WM) fiber tracts and investigate the implications for cognitive function and disability outcomes. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe utilized the automated fiber quantification (AFQ) method to extract 18 WM fiber tracts from the imaging data of 103 MS patients in total. Unsupervised machine learning techniques were applied to conduct cluster analysis and identify distinct subtypes. Clinical and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics were compared among the subtypes, and survival analysis was conducted to examine disability progression and cognitive impairment.
resultsThe clustering analysis revealed three distinct subtypes with variations in fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD). Significant differences were observed in clinical and DTI metrics among the subtypes. Subtype 3 showed the fastest disability progression and cognitive decline, while Subtype 2 exhibited a slower rate, and Subtype 1 fell in between.
conclusionsSubtyping MS based on WM fiber tracts using unsupervised machine learning identified distinct subtypes with significant cognitive and disability differences. WM abnormalities may serve as biomarkers for predicting disease outcomes, enabling personalized treatment strategies and prognostic predictions for MS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.