Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38409255›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Transfer learning with graph neural networks for improved molecular property prediction in the multi-fidelity setting.

David Buterez, Jon Paul Janet, Steven J Kiddle, Dino Oglic, Pietro Lió

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Unifying pJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  7. The Tsetlin Machine: A "Third Way" in QSAR Modeling.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David ButerezDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. db804@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6558-0833
Jon Paul JanetMolecular AI, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7825-4797
Steven J KiddleData Science & Advanced Analytics, Data Science & AI, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Dino OglicCentre for AI, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Pietro LióDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0540-5053

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigate the potential of graph neural networks for transfer learning and improving molecular property prediction on sparse and expensive to acquire high-fidelity data by leveraging low-fidelity measurements as an inexpensive proxy for a targeted property of interest. This problem arises in discovery processes that rely on screening funnels for trading off the overall costs against throughput and accuracy. Typically, individual stages in these processes are loosely connected and each one generates data at different scale and fidelity. We consider this setup holistically and demonstrate empirically that existing transfer learning techniques for graph neural networks are generally unable to harness the information from multi-fidelity cascades. Here, we propose several effective transfer learning strategies and study them in transductive and inductive settings. Our analysis involves a collection of more than 28 million unique experimental protein-ligand interactions across 37 targets from drug discovery by high-throughput screening and 12 quantum properties from the dataset QMugs. The results indicate that transfer learning can improve the performance on sparse tasks by up to eight times while using an order of magnitude less high-fidelity training data. Moreover, the proposed methods consistently outperform existing transfer learning strategies for graph-structured data on drug discovery and quantum mechanics datasets.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryLearningHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysMachine LearningNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID38409255
PMCPMC11258334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.