Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38409223›Full record

ArticleNature methods2024

scGPT: toward building a foundation model for single-cell multi-omics using generative AI.

Haotian Cui, Chloe Wang, Hassaan Maan, Kuan Pang, Fengning Luo, Nan Duan, Bo Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 704 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
704citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

704 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Latent causal diffusions for single-cell perturbation modeling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

644 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haotian Cui *Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontartio, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8119-9485
Chloe Wang *Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontartio, Canada.
Hassaan MaanPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontartio, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3830-7177
Kuan PangDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3338-1738
Fengning LuoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nan DuanMicrosoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3387-4674
Bo WangPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontartio, Canada. bowang@vectorinstitute.ai.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9620-3413

Funding

Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology) DGECR-2020-00294Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology) Doctoral FellowshipCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology) RGPIN-2020-06189University Health Network (UHN) Peter Munk Cardiac Centre AI Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generative pretrained models have achieved remarkable success in various domains such as language and computer vision. Specifically, the combination of large-scale diverse datasets and pretrained transformers has emerged as a promising approach for developing foundation models. Drawing parallels between language and cellular biology (in which texts comprise words; similarly, cells are defined by genes), our study probes the applicability of foundation models to advance cellular biology and genetic research. Using burgeoning single-cell sequencing data, we have constructed a foundation model for single-cell biology, scGPT, based on a generative pretrained transformer across a repository of over 33 million cells. Our findings illustrate that scGPT effectively distills critical biological insights concerning genes and cells. Through further adaptation of transfer learning, scGPT can be optimized to achieve superior performance across diverse downstream applications. This includes tasks such as cell type annotation, multi-batch integration, multi-omic integration, perturbation response prediction and gene network inference.

Indexed as

Single-Cell AnalysisAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceComputational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMultiomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.