Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38409062›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2024

The use of extracorporeal blood purification therapies and sequential extracorporeal support in patients with septic shock (EROICASS): a study protocol for a national, non-interventional, observational multicenter, prospective study.

Silvia De Rosa, Fiorenza Ferrari, Massimiliano Greco, Vincenzo Pota, Michele Umbrello, Antonella Cotoia, Laura Pasin, Federico Nalesso, Gianluca Paternoster, Gianluca Villa and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Silvia De RosaCentre for Medical Sciences (CISMed), University of Trento, 38122, Trento, Italy. silvia.derosa@unitn.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8987-4596
Fiorenza FerrariInternational Renal Research Institute of Vicenza (IRRV), Vicenza, Italy.
Massimiliano GrecoIRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy.
Vincenzo PotaDepartment of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Michele UmbrelloSection of Resuscitation and Anesthesia, ASST Ovest Milanese, Ospedale Nuovo Di Legnano, Legnano, Milan, Italy.
Antonella CotoiaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Laura PasinInternational Renal Research Institute of Vicenza (IRRV), Vicenza, Italy.
Federico NalessoNephrology, University Hospital, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Gianluca PaternosterDivision of Cardiac Resuscitation, Cardiovascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Carlo Hospital, Potenza, Italy.
Gianluca VillaDepartment of Health Sciences, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine Section of Anesthesia, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Sergio LassolaAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, Santa Chiara Regional Hospital, APSS, Trento, Italy.
Sara MioriAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, Santa Chiara Regional Hospital, APSS, Trento, Italy.
Andrea SannaAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, Santa Chiara Regional Hospital, APSS, Trento, Italy.
Vicenzo CantaluppiDepartment of Translational Medicine, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, "Maggiore Della Carità" University Hospital, University of Piemonte Orientale (UPO), Novara, Italy.
Marita MarengoDepartment of Specialist Medicine, Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Locale (ASL) CN1, Cuneo, Italy.
Fabrizio ValenteNephrology and Dialysis, Santa Chiara Regional Hospital, APSS, Trento, Italy.
Marco FiorentinoDepartment of Surgical, Oncological, and Oral Science (Di.Chir.On.S.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Giuliano BrunoriCentre for Medical Sciences (CISMed), University of Trento, 38122, Trento, Italy.
Giacomo BellaniCentre for Medical Sciences (CISMed), University of Trento, 38122, Trento, Italy.
Antonino GiarratanoDepartment of Surgical, Oncological, and Oral Science (Di.Chir.On.S.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Ospedale Santa Chiara · ITUniversity of Trento · ITASL Roma · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Civile di Legnano · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone" di Palermo · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITHumanitas University · ITInternational Renal Research Institute of Vicenza · ITOspedale San Carlo · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Foggia · ITUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeptic shock, a critical condition characterized by organ failure, presents a substantial mortality risk in intensive care units (ICUs), with the 28-day mortality rate possibly reaching 40%. Conventional management of septic shock typically involves the administration of antibiotics, supportive care for organ dysfunction, and, if necessary, surgical intervention to address the source of infection. In recent decades, extracorporeal blood purification therapies (EBPT) have emerged as potential interventions aimed at modulating the inflammatory response and restoring homeostasis in patients with sepsis. Likewise, sequential extracorporeal therapy in sepsis (SETS) interventions offer comprehensive organ support in the setting of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). The EROICASS study will assess and describe the utilization of EBPT in patients with septic shock. Additionally, we will evaluate the potential association between EBPT treatment utilization and 90-day mortality in septic shock cases in Italy.

methodsThe EROICASS study is a national, non-interventional, multicenter observational prospective cohort study. All consecutive patients with septic shock at participating centers will be prospectively enrolled, with data collection extending from intensive care unit (ICU) admission to hospital discharge. Variables including patient demographics, clinical parameters, EBPT/SETS utilization, and outcomes will be recorded using a web-based data capture system. Statistical analyses will encompass descriptive statistics, hypothesis testing, multivariable regression models, and survival analysis to elucidate the associations between EBPT/SETS utilization and patient outcomes.

conclusionsThe EROICASS study provides valuable insights into the utilization and outcomes of EBPT and SETS in septic shock management. Through analysis of usage patterns and clinical data, this study aims to guide treatment decisions and enhance patient care. The implications of these findings may impact clinical guidelines, potentially improving survival rates and patient outcomes in septic shock cases.

Indexed as

EROICASSExtracorporeal blood purification therapiesSepsisSepsis-associated AKISequential extracorporeal support

Identifiers

PMID38409062
PMCPMC10898122
OpenAlexW4392155583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.