Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38409030›Full record

SynthesisJournal of ovarian research2024

PARP inhibitor era in ovarian cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

István Baradács, Brigitta Teutsch, Alex Váradi, Alexandra Bilá, Ádám Vincze, Péter Hegyi, Tamás Fazekas, Balázs Komoróczy, Péter Nyirády, Nándor Ács and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of ovarian research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility and Chemosensitivity to KRAS Modulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

István BaradácsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 78/A, Budapest, H-1082, Hungary.
Brigitta TeutschCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Alex VáradiInstitute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Alexandra BiláCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Ádám VinczeCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Péter HegyiCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Tamás FazekasCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Balázs KomoróczyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 78/A, Budapest, H-1082, Hungary.
Péter NyirádyCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Nándor ÁcsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 78/A, Budapest, H-1082, Hungary.
Ferenc BánhidyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 78/A, Budapest, H-1082, Hungary.
Balázs LintnerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 78/A, Budapest, H-1082, Hungary. lintnerster@gmail.com.
Semmelweis University · HUUniversity of Pecs · HU

Funding

New National Excellence Program ÚNKP-22-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOvarian cancer is the eighth leading cause of cancer-related death among women, characterized by late diagnosis and a high relapse rate. In randomized controlled trials, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in treating advanced ovarian cancer.

methodsThis review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021283150), included all phase II and phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of PARPi on ovarian cancer until the 13th of April, 2022. The main outcomes were progression- free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs), and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The random-effects model was applied in all analyses.

resultsIn the meta-analysis, 16 eligible RCTs were included, with a total of 5,815 patients. In recurrent ovarian cancer, PARPi maintenance therapy showed a significant PFS benefit over placebo in the total population (HR 0.34, CI 0.29-0.40), BRCA mutant (HR 0.24, CI 0.18-0.31), germline BRCA mutant (HR 0.23, CI 0.18-0.30), and BRCA wild-type cases (HR 0.50, CI 0.39-0.65). PARPi monotherapy also improved PFS (HR 0.62, CI 0.51-0.76) compared with chemotherapy in BRCAm patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. The use of PARPi maintenance therapy resulted in an improvement in PFS over placebo in newly-diagnosed cancers in the overall population (HR 0.46, CI 0.30-0.71) and the BRCAm population (HR 0.36, CI 0.29-0.44). Although the risk of severe AEs was increased by PARPi therapy compared to placebo in most settings investigated, these side effects were controllable with dose modification, and treatment discontinuation was required in the minority of cases.

conclusionsPARPis are an effective therapeutic option for newly-diagnosed and recurrent ovarian cancer. Despite a minor increase in the frequency of serious adverse effects, they are generally well tolerated.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsOvarian NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntineoplastic AgentsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsHomologous recombination repairHRDNiraparibOlaparibRucaparib

Identifiers

PMID38409030
PMCPMC10895809
OpenAlexW4392157924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.