Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38409008›Full record

SynthesisBMC surgery2024

Quality of life after emergency laparotomy: a systematic review.

Esha Khanderia, Ravi Aggarwal, George Bouras, Vanash Patel

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Health-related quality of life after emergency abdominal surgery.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Long-term impact of emergency laparotomy on health-related quality of life.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Esha KhanderiaWatford General Hospital, West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, UK. esha.khanderia@nhs.net.
Ravi AggarwalDepartment of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
George BourasUniversity Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Vanash PatelWatford General Hospital, West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency laparotomy is a commonly performed surgical procedure that has higher post-operative morbidity and mortality than elective surgery. Previous research has identified that patients valued postoperative quality of life (QoL) more than the risk of mortality when deciding to undergo emergency surgery. Current pre-operative scoring and risk stratification systems for emergency laparotomy do not account for or provide prediction tools for post-operative QoL. This study aims to systematically review previous literature to determine post-operative QoL in patients who undergo emergency laparotomy.

methodsA literature search was undertaken in Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library to identify studies measuring post-operative QoL in patients who have had emergency laparotomy up to 29th April 2023. Mean QoL scores from the studies included were combined to calculate the average effect of emergency laparotomy on QoL. The primary outcome of the review was postoperative QoL after emergency laparotomy when compared with a comparator group. Secondary outcomes included the quality of included studies.

resultsTen studies in the literature assessing the QoL of patients after emergency laparotomy were identified. Three studies showed that patients had improved QoL and seven showed worse QoL following emergency laparotomy. Length of time for QoL to return to baseline varied ranged from 3 to 12 months post-operatively. Length of hospital stay was identified as an independent risk factor for poorer QoL post-surgery.

conclusionsOutcome reporting for patients who undergo emergency laparotomy should be expanded further to include QoL. Further work is required to investigate this and elicit factors that can improve QoL post-operatively.

Indexed as

LaparotomyQuality of LifeEmergenciesHumansLength of StayPostoperative ComplicationsAbdominal SurgeryCare of the ElderlyEmergency LaparotomyQOLQuality of LifeSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID38409008
PMCPMC10898072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.