ArticleBioData mining2024
Assessment of the causal relationship between gut microbiota and cardiovascular diseases: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis.
Article in BioData mining, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gut microbiome and atrial fibrillation: mechanistic insights metabolites and comorbidities. Systematic review.Gut microbes · 2025Pooled it
- Effect ofNutrients · 2026Trial
- Randomized study ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2025Trial
- Causal Relationships Between Oral Microbiota and Inflammatory Skin Diseases.International dental journal · 2026Article
- The Gut Microbiota-Metabolite-Host Axis in Cardiometabolic Diseases: Bridging Bench to Bedside.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Review
- The Gut-Heart Axis in Cardiovascular Disease: Microbial Metabolites, Mediterranean and Traditional Turkish Dietary Patterns, and Personalized Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Association between gut microbiota and chronic diseases in East Asian ethnicity: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.Medicine · 2026Observational
- Bridging the Gut Microbiota and the Brain, Kidney, and Cardiovascular Health: The Role of Probiotics.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Lachnospiraceae-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Mediate the Cardioprotective Effects of Barley Leaf in Myocardial Infarction by Improving Intestinal Stem Cell Function.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2026Article
- Article
- Deciphering gut microbial impact in coronary artery disease through multimodal computational approaches.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Impact of gut microbiome on atrial fibrillation: Mechanistic insights and future directions in individualized medicine.World journal of cardiology · 2025Review
- Review
- Distinct Gut Microbiota Profiles in Unruptured and Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Focus on Butyrate-Producing Bacteria.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring the effect of gut flora on atrial fibrillation based on epidemiological history.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Diseases: Exploring the Role of Microbiota and Immunity.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Causal effects of gut microbiota on the prognosis of ischemic stroke: evidence from a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have shown an association between gut microbiota and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). However, the underlying causal relationship remains unclear. This study aims to elucidate the causal relationship between gut microbiota and CVDs and to explore the pathogenic role of gut microbiota in CVDs.
methodsIn this two-sample Mendelian randomization study, we used genetic instruments from publicly available genome-wide association studies, including single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with gut microbiota (n = 14,306) and CVDs (n = 2,207,591). We employed multiple statistical analysis methods, including inverse variance weighting, MR Egger, weighted median, MR pleiotropic residuals and outliers, and the leave-one-out method, to estimate the causal relationship between gut microbiota and CVDs. Additionally, we conducted multiple analyses to assess horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity.
resultsGWAS summary data were available from a pooled sample of 2,221,897 adult and adolescent participants. Our findings indicated that specific gut microbiota had either protective or detrimental effects on CVDs. Notably, Howardella (OR = 0.955, 95% CI: 0.913-0.999, P = .05), Intestinibacter (OR = 0.908, 95% CI:0.831-0.993, P = .03), Lachnospiraceae (NK4A136 group) (OR = 0.904, 95% CI:0.841-0.973, P = .007), Turicibacter (OR = 0.904, 95% CI: 0.838-0.976, P = .01), Holdemania (OR, 0.898; 95% CI: 0.810-0.995, P = .04) and Odoribacter (OR, 0.835; 95% CI: 0.710-0.993, P = .04) exhibited a protective causal effect on atrial fibrillation, while other microbiota had adverse causal effects. Similar effects were observed with respect to coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and hypertension. Furthermore, reversed Mendelian randomization analyses revealed that atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke had causal effects on certain gut microbiotas.
conclusionOur study underscored the importance of gut microbiota in the context of CVDs and lent support to the hypothesis that increasing the abundance of probiotics or decreasing the abundance of harmful bacterial populations may offer protection against specific CVDs. Nevertheless, further research is essential to translate these findings into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.