ArticleBMC cancer2024
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma third line systemic treatments: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of TAS-102 plus Surufatinib in third and later line metastatic pancreatic cancer: a prospective, single center and biomarker exploratory, phase II study.Molecular cancer · 2025Trial
- Open-Label, Phase II Trial of Extracellular Regulated Kinase Inhibition Alone and in Combination With Autophagy Inhibition in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.JCO precision oncology · 2025Trial
- Overcoming Daraxonrasib Resistance: Allele-Specific Mechanisms Guide Salvage Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The Impact of Early Palliative Care Decisions on Hospital Service Utilization and End-of-Life Care in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer-A Retrospective Study.Journal of palliative care · 2026Article
- Epigenetic and transcriptional control of classical and basal-like cell states in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Gastroenterology report · 2026Review
- Survival outcomes and prognostic value of nutritional and inflammatory markers in third-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Identification of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who might benefit from third-line chemotherapy.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Efficacy of third-line chemotherapy following nanoliposomal irinotecan combined with fluorouracil and folinic acid as second-line treatment for unresectable pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) primarily relies on FOLFIRINOX (LV5FU- irinotecan - Oxaliplatine) and Gemcitabine - Nab-Paclitaxel in the first-line setting. However, second-lines remain less well-defined and there is limited data regarding third-line treatments. The objective of our study was to determine the proportion of patients advancing to third line chemotherapy, to outline the various third-line chemotherapy regimens used in routine practice and to evaluate their respective efficacy.
methodsA retrospective single-center cohort from 2010-2022 compiled baseline characteristics, treatment outcomes and survival of PDAC patients who received at least one chemotherapy line in a French tertiary-center. Overall survivals (OS) were analyzed using a Cox multivariable model.
resultsIn total, 676 patients were included, with a median follow-up time of 69.4 months, (Interquartile Range (IQR) = 72.1). Of these, 251 patients (37%) that proceeded to 3
conclusionIn our cohort, one-third of treated patients proceeded to 3
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.