ArticleBMC ophthalmology2024
Differences in anterior chamber depth in keratoconus patients with binocular very asymmetry ectasia.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of visual outcomes of phakic intraocular lens implantation in keratoconus and normal eyes.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Challenges in Biometry and Intraocular Lens Power Calculations in Keratoconus: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Topographic factors associated with anterior chamber angle narrowing in patients with keratoconus.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the difference in anterior chamber depth (ACD) between two eyes among keratoconus patients with binocular very asymmetric ectasia (VAE) and to explore the influencing factors.
methodsThe corneal curvature and ACD in both eyes of patients with VAE were measured by Sirius (version 3.2, CSO, Italy) at the following points: corneal vertex, maximum curvature (apex), and the 1.5 mm, 2.5 mm, and 3.5 mm superior-, inferior-, nasal-, temporal-paracentral from center. The mean pupil power (MPP) and corneal morphology parameters were also measured. Correlations between ACD and curvature and morphology parameters were analyzed by linear regression.
results172 eyes of 86 patients (9 to 45 years) were classified into the VAE-N (n = 86) group and the VAE-E group (n = 86) based on the corneal morphology. The central (3.32 ± 0.27 mm versus 3.43 ± 0.29 mm, P < 0.001) and paracentral ACDs increased significantly in the VAE-E group, and the corneal morphology parameters were also significantly higher. The central ACD was significantly correlated with the MPP (r = 0.465), KVf/b (Keratoconus Vertex front/back) (r = 0.306, r = 0.327), and BCVf/b (Baiocchi Calossi Versaci front/back) (r = 0.356, r = 0.416). Linear regression showed good relationships between △ACD and △MPP (R
conclusionsThe ACD was larger in the VAE-E group. The difference in ACD between the VAE-E and VAE-N groups was significantly correlated with corneal curvature and the extent of corneal elevation, indicating the influences of both the corneal magnification effect and corneal ectasia on ACD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.