Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38408928›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2024

Quantification of preexisting lung ground glass opacities on CT for predicting checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Xinyue Wang, Jinkun Zhao, Ting Mei, Wenting Liu, Xiuqiong Chen, Jingya Wang, Richeng Jiang, Zhaoxiang Ye, Dingzhi Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xinyue Wang *Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Jinkun Zhao *Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Ting Mei *Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Wenting LiuTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Xiuqiong ChenTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Jingya WangTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Richeng JiangTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China. jiangricheng@tjmuch.com.
Zhaoxiang YeTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China. yezhaoxiang@163.com.
Dingzhi HuangTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China. dingzhih72@163.com.
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82171938National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172620National Natural Science Foundation of China 822036289Tianjin Key Medical Discipline (Specialty) Construction Project TJYXZDXK-010A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can lead to life-threatening pneumonitis, and pre-existing interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are a risk factor for checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP). However, the subjective assessment of ILA and the lack of standardized methods restrict its clinical utility as a predictive factor. This study aims to identify non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients at high risk of CIP using quantitative imaging.

methodsThis cohort study involved 206 cases in the training set and 111 cases in the validation set. It included locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients who underwent ICI therapy. A deep learning algorithm labeled the interstitial lesions and computed their volume. Two predictive models were developed to predict the probability of grade ≥ 2 CIP or severe CIP (grade ≥ 3). Cox proportional hazard models were employed to analyze predictors of progression-free survival (PFS).

resultsIn a training cohort of 206 patients, 21.4% experienced CIP. Two models were developed to predict the probability of CIP based on different predictors. Model 1 utilized age, histology, and preexisting ground glass opacity (GGO) percentage of the whole lung to predict grade ≥ 2 CIP, while Model 2 used histology and GGO percentage in the right lower lung to predict grade ≥ 3 CIP. These models were validated, and their accuracy was assessed. In another exploratory analysis, the presence of GGOs involving more than one lobe on pretreatment CT scans was identified as a risk factor for progression-free survival.

conclusionsThe assessment of GGO volume and distribution on pre-treatment CT scans could assist in monitoring and manage the risk of CIP in NSCLC patients receiving ICI therapy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study's quantitative imaging and computational analysis can help identify NSCLC patients at high risk of CIP, allowing for better risk management and potentially improved outcomes in those receivingICI treatment.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsPneumoniaCohort StudiesHumansLungRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedCheckpoint inhibitor pneumonitisDeep learningGround glass opacityImmune checkpoint inhibitorNon-small cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID38408928
PMCPMC10895810
OpenAlexW4392147281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.