Cost-effectiveness of task-shifting in resource-constrained settings.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Community Health Workers in Perinatal Mental Health: Feasibility and Challenges of Implementing a Task-Sharing Model.Community mental health journal · 2026
   Article
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis in primary care research: A practical guide for early-career researchers.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025
   Article
3. Are Economic Evaluations of Task Shifting Too Narrow in Focus? A Rapid Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2025
   Review
4. A Conversational Agent (PracticePal) to Support the Delivery of a Brief Behavioral Activation Treatment for Depression in Rural India: Development and Pilot-Testing Study.JMIR formative research · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Implementation strategies to build mental health-care capacity in Malawi: a health-economic evaluation.2024

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as