Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38408312›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2024

Synthesis and Deconstruction of Polyethylene-type Materials.

Simon T Schwab, Maximilian Baur, Taylor F Nelson, Stefan Mecking

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Mechanically Triggered Chemical Recyclable Polyethylene-Like Materials.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Simon T SchwabChair of Chemical Materials Science, Department of Chemistry, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstraße 10, 78464 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-9342-8538
Maximilian BaurChair of Chemical Materials Science, Department of Chemistry, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstraße 10, 78464 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8222-9500
Taylor F NelsonChair of Chemical Materials Science, Department of Chemistry, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstraße 10, 78464 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0719-4402
Stefan MeckingChair of Chemical Materials Science, Department of Chemistry, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstraße 10, 78464 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6618-6659

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyethylene deconstruction to reusable smaller molecules is hindered by the chemical inertness of its hydrocarbon chains. Pyrolysis and related approaches commonly require high temperatures, are energy-intensive, and yield mixtures of multiple classes of compounds. Selective cleavage reactions under mild conditions (<ca. 200 °C) are key to improve the efficacy of chemical recycling and upcycling approaches. These can be enabled by introduction of low densities of predetermined breaking points in the polyethylene chains during the step-growth or chain-growth synthetic construction of designed-for-recycling polyethylene-type materials. Alternatively, they can be accomplished by postpolymerization functionalization of postconsumer polyethylene waste via dehydrogenation and follow-up reactions or through oxidation to long-chain dicarboxylates. Deconstruction of litter under environmental conditions via the aforementioned break points can alleviate plastics' persistency, as a backstop to closed-loop recycling.

Identifiers

PMID38408312
PMCPMC10941192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.