Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38408255›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Live music stimulates the affective brain and emotionally entrains listeners in real time.

Wiebke Trost, Caitlyn Trevor, Natalia Fernandez, Florence Steiner, Sascha Frühholz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Expressing emotions through music.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Singing in the brain.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Live music stimulates the affective brain and emotionally entrains listeners in real time.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wiebke TrostCognitive and Affective Neuroscience Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich 8050, Switzerland.
Caitlyn TrevorCognitive and Affective Neuroscience Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich 8050, Switzerland.
Natalia FernandezCognitive and Affective Neuroscience Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich 8050, Switzerland.
Florence SteinerCognitive and Affective Neuroscience Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich 8050, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0298-6294
Sascha FrühholzCognitive and Affective Neuroscience Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich 8050, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6485-3817

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 100014_182135/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Music is powerful in conveying emotions and triggering affective brain mechanisms. Affective brain responses in previous studies were however rather inconsistent, potentially because of the non-adaptive nature of recorded music used so far. Live music instead can be dynamic and adaptive and is often modulated in response to audience feedback to maximize emotional responses in listeners. Here, we introduce a setup for studying emotional responses to live music in a closed-loop neurofeedback setup. This setup linked live performances by musicians to neural processing in listeners, with listeners' amygdala activity was displayed to musicians in real time. Brain activity was measured using functional MRI, and especially amygdala activity was quantified in real time for the neurofeedback signal. Live pleasant and unpleasant piano music performed in response to amygdala neurofeedback from listeners was acoustically very different from comparable recorded music and elicited significantly higher and more consistent amygdala activity. Higher activity was also found in a broader neural network for emotion processing during live compared to recorded music. This finding included observations of the predominance for aversive coding in the ventral striatum while listening to unpleasant music, and involvement of the thalamic pulvinar nucleus, presumably for regulating attentional and cortical flow mechanisms. Live music also stimulated a dense functional neural network with the amygdala as a central node influencing other brain systems. Finally, only live music showed a strong and positive coupling between features of the musical performance and brain activity in listeners pointing to real-time and dynamic entrainment processes.

Indexed as

MusicAffectAmygdalaAuditory PerceptionBrainEmotionsMagnetic Resonance Imagingamygdalaemotionlimbicmusicneurofeedback

Identifiers

PMID38408255
PMCPMC10927510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.