Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38408248›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

The reach of reactivation: Effects of consciously triggered versus unconsciously triggered reactivation of associative memory.

Amir Tal, Eitan Schechtman, Bruce Caughran, Ken A Paller, Lila Davachi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Awake reactivation is not a uniform process.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Updating social evaluation during sleep.NPJ science of learning · 2025
    Article
  6. Replay in the human visual cortex during brief task pauses is linked to implicit learning of successor representations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Reactivation fails to offer the improvement sleep does.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reminiscing under the radar.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amir Tal *Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
Eitan Schechtman *Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697.
Bruce CaughranDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.
Ken A Paller *Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.ORCID 0000-0003-4415-4143
Lila Davachi *Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.ORCID 0000-0003-4317-0889

Funding

The role of context in sleep-related memory reactivation in humansR00MH122663 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI SCHECHTMAN-DRAYMAN, EITAN · 2023 to 2025
$933k
NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH122663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consolidating memories for long-term storage depends on reactivation. Reactivation occurs both consciously, during wakefulness, and unconsciously, during wakefulness and sleep. While considerable work has examined conscious awake and unconscious sleep reactivation, in this study, we directly compare the consequences of conscious and unconscious reactivation during wakefulness. Forty-one participants learned associations consisting of adjective-object-position triads. Objects were clustered into distinct semantic groups (e.g., fruits, vehicles) such that we could examine consequences of reactivation on semantically related memories. After an intensive learning protocol, we systematically reactivated some of the triads by presenting the adjective as a cue. Reactivation was done so that it was consciously experienced for some triads, and only unconsciously processed for others. Memory for spatial positions, the most distal part of the association, was affected by reactivation in a consciousness-dependent and memory-strength-dependent manner. Conscious reactivation resulted in weakening of semantically related memories that were strong initially, resonating with prior findings of retrieval-induced forgetting. Unconscious reactivation, on the other hand, selectively benefited weak reactivated memories, as previously shown for reactivation during sleep. Semantically linked memories were not impaired, but rather were integrated with the reactivated memory. These results taken together demonstrate that conscious and unconscious reactivation have qualitatively different consequences. Results support a consciousness-dependent inhibition account, whereby unconscious reactivation entails less inhibition than conscious reactivation, thus allowing more liberal spread of activation. Findings set the stage for additional exploration into the role of conscious experience in memory storage and structuring.

Indexed as

LearningMemory ConsolidationConsciousnessHumansInhibition, PsychologicalSleepWakefulnessconsciousnessinhibitionmemory consolidationmemory reactivation

Identifiers

PMID38408248
PMCPMC10927514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.