Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38408152›Full record

GuidelineOtolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2024

Clinical Practice Guideline: Immunotherapy for Inhalant Allergy.

Richard K Gurgel, Fuad M Baroody, Cecelia C Damask, James Whit Mims, Stacey L Ishman, Dole P Baker, Kevin J Contrera, Fariha S Farid, John A Fornadley, Donna D Gardner and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Allergen Immunotherapy in Autoimmune Terrain: A Case Study.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Single-Domain Antibodies-Novel Tools to Study and Treat Allergies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. A Pediatric Case of Reversible Eosinophilic Duodenitis Associated With Sublingual Immunotherapy.Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Richard K GurgelUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Fuad M BaroodyThe University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Cecelia C DamaskLake Mary ENT and Allergy, Lake Mary, Florida, USA.
James Whit MimsWake Forest Baptist Health, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Stacey L IshmanUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Dole P BakerAnderson ENT & Facial Plastics, Anderson, South Carolina, USA.
Kevin J ContreraUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Fariha S FaridPolyclinic, Seattle, Washington, USA.
John A FornadleyAssociated Otolaryngologists of PA, Inc, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Donna D GardnerAllergy & Asthma Network, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.
LaKeisha R HenryEar Nose & Throat Consultants, Henderson, Nevada, USA.
Jean KimJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Joshua M LevyNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Christine M RegerOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Howard J RitzAlbany Med Health System, Glens Fall, New York, USA.
Robert J StachlerStachler ENT, PC, West Bloomfield, Michigan, USA.
Tulio A ValdezStanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Joe ReyesAmerican Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-7157-9247
Nui DhepyasuwanAmerican Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
American Academy of Otolaryngology — Head and Neck Surgery · USAnderson University - South Carolina · USAtrium Health Wake Forest Baptist · USCranbrook Academy of Art · USENT and Allergy · USHershey (United States) · USJohns Hopkins University · USNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders · USPalo Alto University · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Utah · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Sinonasal and Olfaction ProgramZIADC000098 · NIDCD · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS · PI LEVY, JOSHUA · 2024 to 2025
$2.5M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DC000098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAllergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the therapeutic exposure to an allergen or allergens selected by clinical assessment and allergy testing to decrease allergic symptoms and induce immunologic tolerance. Inhalant AIT is administered to millions of patients for allergic rhinitis (AR) and allergic asthma (AA) and is most commonly delivered as subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) or sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). Despite its widespread use, there is variability in the initiation and delivery of safe and effective immunotherapy, and there are opportunities for evidence-based recommendations for improved patient care. PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical practice guideline (CPG) is to identify quality improvement opportunities and provide clinicians trustworthy, evidence-based recommendations regarding the management of inhaled allergies with immunotherapy. Specific goals of the guideline are to optimize patient care, promote safe and effective therapy, reduce unjustified variations in care, and reduce the risk of harm. The target patients for the guideline are any individuals aged 5 years and older with AR, with or without AA, who are either candidates for immunotherapy or treated with immunotherapy for their inhalant allergies. The target audience is all clinicians involved in the administration of immunotherapy. This guideline is intended to focus on evidence-based quality improvement opportunities judged most important by the guideline development group (GDG). It is not intended to be a comprehensive, general guide regarding the management of inhaled allergies with immunotherapy. The statements in this guideline are not intended to limit or restrict care provided by clinicians based on their experience and assessment of individual patients. ACTION STATEMENTS: The GDG made a strong recommendation that (Key Action Statement [KAS] 10) the clinician performing allergy skin testing or administering AIT must be able to diagnose and manage anaphylaxis. The GDG made recommendations for the following KASs: (KAS 1) Clinicians should offer or refer to a clinician who can offer immunotherapy for patients with AR with or without AA if their patients' symptoms are inadequately controlled with medical therapy, allergen avoidance, or both, or have a preference for immunomodulation. (KAS 2A) Clinicians should not initiate AIT for patients who are pregnant, have uncontrolled asthma, or are unable to tolerate injectable epinephrine. (KAS 3) Clinicians should evaluate the patient or refer the patient to a clinician who can evaluate for signs and symptoms of asthma before initiating AIT and for signs and symptoms of uncontrolled asthma before administering subsequent AIT. (KAS 4) Clinicians should educate patients who are immunotherapy candidates regarding the differences between SCIT and SLIT (aqueous and tablet) including risks, benefits, convenience, and costs. (KAS 5) Clinicians should educate patients about the potential benefits of AIT in (1) preventing new allergen sensitizations, (2) reducing the risk of developing AA, and (3) altering the natural history of the disease with continued benefit after discontinuation of therapy. (KAS 6) Clinicians who administer SLIT to patients with seasonal AR should offer pre- and co-seasonal immunotherapy. (KAS 7) Clinicians prescribing AIT should limit treatment to only those clinically relevant allergens that correlate with the patient's history and are confirmed by testing. (KAS 9) Clinicians administering AIT should continue escalation or maintenance dosing when patients have local reactions (LRs) to AIT. (KAS 11) Clinicians should avoid repeat allergy testing as an assessment of the efficacy of ongoing AIT unless there is a change in environmental exposures or a loss of control of symptoms. (KAS 12) For patients who are experiencing symptomatic control from AIT, clinicians should treat for a minimum duration of 3 years, with ongoing treatment duration based on patient response to treatment. The GDG offered the following KASs as options: (KAS 2B) Clinicians may choose not to initiate AIT for patients who use concomitant beta-blockers, have a history of anaphylaxis, have systemic immunosuppression, or have eosinophilic esophagitis (SLIT only). (KAS 8) Clinicians may treat polysensitized patients with a limited number of allergens.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisAsthmaRhinitis, AllergicAllergensDesensitization, ImmunologicHumansAllergensallergen immunotherapyallergic asthmaallergic rhinitisanaphylaxisinhalant allergysubcutaneous immunotherapysublingual immunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID38408152
PMCPMC11788925
OpenAlexW4392153761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.