Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38408118›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Small deviations in kinematics and body form dictate muscle performances in the finely tuned avian downstroke.

Marc E Deetjen, Diana D Chin, Ashley M Heers, Bret W Tobalske, David Lentink

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marc E DeetjenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Palo Alto, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6947-6408
Diana D ChinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Palo Alto, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3015-7645
Ashley M HeersDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Palo Alto, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7635-0651
Bret W TobalskeDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5739-6099
David LentinkDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Palo Alto, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4717-6815
Stanford University · USCalifornia State University System · USUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversity of Montana · US

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research FA9550-16-1-0182National Science Foundation CAREER Award 1552419National Science Foundation EFRI 1935216National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program DGE-114747National Science Foundation IOS-1838688Stanford University Stanford Graduate Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Avian takeoff requires peak pectoralis muscle power to generate sufficient aerodynamic force during the downstroke. Subsequently, the much smaller supracoracoideus recovers the wing during the upstroke. How the pectoralis work loop is tuned to power flight is unclear. We integrate wingbeat-resolved muscle, kinematic, and aerodynamic recordings

Indexed as

ColumbidaeFlight, AnimalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaModels, BiologicalMusclesWings, Animalaerodynamic forceanimal locomotionecologyflightmusclewing kinematicswork loop

Identifiers

PMID38408118
PMCPMC10942624
OpenAlexW4386326247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.