ArticlePLoS computational biology2024
Methods and considerations for estimating parameters in biophysically detailed neural models with simulation based inference.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Probabilistic inference of homonymous and heteronymous recurrent inhibition in human muscles from large-scale motor neuron recordings.Science advances · 2026Article
- Uncovering putative neural mechanisms of neurotherapeutic impacts on EEG using the Human Neocortical Neurosolver.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Stochastic intracellular calcium dynamics show preserved structures identified by deep learning classification.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- A novel framework for expanding RNNs with biophysical detail to solve cognitive tasks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence as a surrogate brain: bridging neural dynamical models and data.National science review · 2026Review
- Morphological details contribute to neuronal response variability within the same cell type.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Article
- Dynamic causal modelling in probabilistic programming languages.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
- Automated inference of disease mechanisms in patient-hiPSC-derived neuronal networks.Communications biology · 2025Article
- A Python toolbox for neural circuit parameter inference.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- Cell-mechanical parameter estimation from 1D cell trajectories using simulation-based inference.PloS one · 2025Article
- AI-powered simulation-based inference of a genuinely spatial-stochastic gene regulation model of early mouse embryogenesis.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Neuronal modeling of magnetoencephalography responses in auditory cortex to auditory and visual stimuli.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Controlling morpho-electrophysiological variability of neurons with detailed biophysical models.iScience · 2023Article
- HNN-core: A Python software for cellular and circuit-level interpretation of human MEG/EEG.Journal of open source software · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biophysically detailed neural models are a powerful technique to study neural dynamics in health and disease with a growing number of established and openly available models. A major challenge in the use of such models is that parameter inference is an inherently difficult and unsolved problem. Identifying unique parameter distributions that can account for observed neural dynamics, and differences across experimental conditions, is essential to their meaningful use. Recently, simulation based inference (SBI) has been proposed as an approach to perform Bayesian inference to estimate parameters in detailed neural models. SBI overcomes the challenge of not having access to a likelihood function, which has severely limited inference methods in such models, by leveraging advances in deep learning to perform density estimation. While the substantial methodological advancements offered by SBI are promising, their use in large scale biophysically detailed models is challenging and methods for doing so have not been established, particularly when inferring parameters that can account for time series waveforms. We provide guidelines and considerations on how SBI can be applied to estimate time series waveforms in biophysically detailed neural models starting with a simplified example and extending to specific applications to common MEG/EEG waveforms using the the large scale neural modeling framework of the Human Neocortical Neurosolver. Specifically, we describe how to estimate and compare results from example oscillatory and event related potential simulations. We also describe how diagnostics can be used to assess the quality and uniqueness of the posterior estimates. The methods described provide a principled foundation to guide future applications of SBI in a wide variety of applications that use detailed models to study neural dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.