Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38408099›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

Methods and considerations for estimating parameters in biophysically detailed neural models with simulation based inference.

Nicholas Tolley, Pedro L C Rodrigues, Alexandre Gramfort, Stephanie R Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Dynamic causal modelling in probabilistic programming languages.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. A Python toolbox for neural circuit parameter inference.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicholas TolleyDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0358-0074
Pedro L C RodriguesUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inria, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LJK, Grenoble, France.
Alexandre GramfortUniversité Paris-Saclay, Inria, CEA, Palaiseau, France.
Stephanie R JonesDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.

Funding

Interdisciplinary Predoctoral Neuroscience Training Program in the Neuroscience Graduate Program.T32MH020068 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI LIPSCOMBE, DIANE, SHEINBERG, DAVID L · 1999 to 2025
$7.6M
Dissemination of the Human Neocortical Neurosolver (HNN) software for circuit level interpretation of human MEG/EEGU24NS129945 · NINDS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHANIE Ruggiano JONES · 2023 to 2026
$2.8M
Neuroscience Gateway to Enable Dissemination of Computational And Data Processing Tools And Software.U24EB029005 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MAJUMDAR, AMITAVA · 2019 to 2023
$2.2M
Secondary analysis of resting state MEG data using the Human Neocortical Neurosolver software tool for cellular and circuit-level interpretationRF1MH130415 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI JONES, STEPHANIE RUGGIANO · 2022 to 2022
$1.2M
CRCNS: US-Spain Research Proposal: Interpreting MEG Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Progression with Human Neocortical NeurosolverR01AG076227 · NIA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI JONES, STEPHANIE RUGGIANO · 2021 to 2023
$717k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG076227NIBIB NIH HHS U24 EB029005NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH130415NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020068NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS129945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biophysically detailed neural models are a powerful technique to study neural dynamics in health and disease with a growing number of established and openly available models. A major challenge in the use of such models is that parameter inference is an inherently difficult and unsolved problem. Identifying unique parameter distributions that can account for observed neural dynamics, and differences across experimental conditions, is essential to their meaningful use. Recently, simulation based inference (SBI) has been proposed as an approach to perform Bayesian inference to estimate parameters in detailed neural models. SBI overcomes the challenge of not having access to a likelihood function, which has severely limited inference methods in such models, by leveraging advances in deep learning to perform density estimation. While the substantial methodological advancements offered by SBI are promising, their use in large scale biophysically detailed models is challenging and methods for doing so have not been established, particularly when inferring parameters that can account for time series waveforms. We provide guidelines and considerations on how SBI can be applied to estimate time series waveforms in biophysically detailed neural models starting with a simplified example and extending to specific applications to common MEG/EEG waveforms using the the large scale neural modeling framework of the Human Neocortical Neurosolver. Specifically, we describe how to estimate and compare results from example oscillatory and event related potential simulations. We also describe how diagnostics can be used to assess the quality and uniqueness of the posterior estimates. The methods described provide a principled foundation to guide future applications of SBI in a wide variety of applications that use detailed models to study neural dynamics.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremComputer SimulationHumans

Identifiers

PMID38408099
PMCPMC10919875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.