Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38408095›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2024

Quantitative PCR as a marker for preemptive therapy and its role in therapeutic control in Trypanosoma cruzi/HIV coinfection.

Vera Lúcia Teixeira de Freitas, Christina Terra Gallafrio Novaes, Ana Marli Christovam Sartori, Noemia Barbosa Carvalho, Sheila Cristina Vicente da Silva, Érika Shimoda Nakanishi, Fernando Salvador, Cleudson Nery de Castro, Rita Cristina Bezerra, Elizabeth Visone Nunes Westphalen and 6 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chagas Disease: An Opportunistic Infection in AIDS.Current infectious disease reports · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Vera Lúcia Teixeira de FreitasDepartamento de Molestias Infecciosas e Parasitarias, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Christina Terra Gallafrio NovaesDivisao de Molestias Infecciosas e Parasitarias, Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Marli Christovam SartoriDivisao de Molestias Infecciosas e Parasitarias, Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Noemia Barbosa CarvalhoDivisao de Molestias Infecciosas e Parasitarias, Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sheila Cristina Vicente da SilvaDepartamento de Molestias Infecciosas e Parasitarias, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Érika Shimoda NakanishiLaboratorio de Investigacao Medica em Imunologia (LIM 48), Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernando SalvadorInternational Health Unit Vall d'Hebron-Drassanes, Infectious Diseases Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, PROSICS Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Cleudson Nery de CastroCentre for Tropical Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Brasilia, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Rita Cristina BezerraLaboratorio de Investigacao Medica em Parasitologia (LIM 46), Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Elizabeth Visone Nunes WestphalenNucleo de Parasitoses Sistemicas, Centro de Parasitologia e Micologia, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, São Paulo, Brazil.
Caroline Medeji Ramos de OliveiraDepartamento de Molestias Infecciosas e Parasitarias, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Felipe Delatorre BusserDepartamento de Molestias Infecciosas e Parasitarias, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Yeh-Li HoDivisao de Molestias Infecciosas e Parasitarias, Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Renata BuccheriInstituto de Infectologia Emilio Ribas, São Paulo, Brasil.
Carolina BonillaDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Aparecida Shikanai-YasudaDepartamento de Molestias Infecciosas e Parasitarias, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3864-041X
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRInstituto Adolfo Lutz · BRInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESPacific Research Institute · USUniversidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível superior, CAPESFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloNational Council for Scientific and Technological DevelopmentResearch Productivity Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrypanosoma cruzi and HIV coinfection can evolve with depression of cellular immunity and increased parasitemia. We applied quantitative PCR (qPCR) as a marker for preemptive antiparasitic treatment to avoid fatal Chagas disease reactivation and analyzed the outcome of treated cases. METHODOLOGY: This mixed cross-sectional and longitudinal study included 171 Chagas disease patients, 60 coinfected with HIV. Of these 60 patients, ten showed Chagas disease reactivation, confirmed by parasites identified in the blood, cerebrospinal fluid, or tissues, 12 exhibited high parasitemia without reactivation, and 38 had low parasitemia and no reactivation.

resultsWe showed, for the first time, the success of the timely introduction of benznidazole in the non-reactivated group with high levels of parasitemia detected by qPCR and the absence of parasites in reactivated cases with at least 58 days of benznidazole. All HIV+ patients with or without reactivation had a 4.0-5.1 higher chance of having parasitemia than HIV seronegative cases. A positive correlation was found between parasites and viral loads. Remarkably, treated T. cruzi/HIV-coinfected patients had 77.3% conversion from positive to negative parasitemia compared to 19.1% of untreated patients. Additionally, untreated patients showed ~13.6 times higher Odds Ratio of having positive parasitemia in the follow-up period compared with treated patients. Treated and untreated patients showed no differences regarding the evolution of Chagas disease. The main factors associated with all-cause mortality were higher parasitemia, lower CD4 counts/μL, higher viral load, and absence of antiretroviral therapy.

conclusionWe recommend qPCR prospective monitoring of T. cruzi parasitemia in HIV+ coinfected patients and point out the value of pre-emptive therapy for those with high parasitemia. In parallel, early antiretroviral therapy introduction is advisable, aiming at viral load control, immune response restoration, and increasing survival. We also suggest an early antiparasitic treatment for all coinfected patients, followed by effectiveness analysis alongside antiretroviral therapy.

Indexed as

Chagas DiseaseCoinfectionHIV InfectionsNitroimidazolesTrypanosoma cruziAntiparasitic AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesParasitemiaPolymerase Chain ReactionProspective StudiesAntiparasitic AgentsbenzonidazoleNitroimidazoles

Identifiers

PMID38408095
PMCPMC10896531
OpenAlexW4392154023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.