Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38408042›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Nearshore fish community changes along the Toronto waterfront in accordance with management and restoration goals: Insights from two decades of monitoring.

Sebastian Theis, Andrea Chreston, Angela Wallace, Brian Graham, Brynn Coey, Don Little, Lyndsay Cartwright, Mark Poesch, Rick Portiss, Jonathan Ruppert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sebastian TheisFisheries and Aquatic Conservation Lab, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9840-3806
Andrea ChrestonToronto and Region Conservation Authority, Watershed Planning and Ecosystem Science, North York, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0005-5059-1229
Angela WallaceToronto and Region Conservation Authority, Watershed Planning and Ecosystem Science, North York, Ontario, Canada.
Brian GrahamToronto and Region Conservation Authority, Watershed Planning and Ecosystem Science, North York, Ontario, Canada.
Brynn CoeyToronto and Region Conservation Authority, Watershed Planning and Ecosystem Science, North York, Ontario, Canada.
Don LittleToronto and Region Conservation Authority, Watershed Planning and Ecosystem Science, North York, Ontario, Canada.
Lyndsay CartwrightToronto and Region Conservation Authority, Watershed Planning and Ecosystem Science, North York, Ontario, Canada.
Mark PoeschFisheries and Aquatic Conservation Lab, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7452-8180
Rick PortissToronto and Region Conservation Authority, Watershed Planning and Ecosystem Science, North York, Ontario, Canada.
Jonathan RuppertToronto and Region Conservation Authority, Watershed Planning and Ecosystem Science, North York, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aquatic habitat in the Greater Toronto Area has been subject to anthropogenic stressors. The subsequent aquatic habitat degradation that followed led to the Toronto and Region waterfront being listed as an Area of Concern in 1987. Thus, extensive shoreline and riparian habitat restoration have been implemented as part of the Toronto and Region Remedial Action Plan in conjunction with local stakeholders, ministries, and NGOs in an overall effort to increase fish, bird, and wildlife habitat. A key aspect of current fish habitat restoration efforts, monitored by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, is to account for long-term community changes within the target ecosystem to better understand overall changes at a larger spatial scale. Here we use electrofishing data from the past 20 years with over 100,000 records and across 72km of coastline to show how declines and fluctuations in fish biomass and catch along the waterfront are driven by a few individual species across three main ecotypes, such as coastal wetlands, embayments, and open coast sites, with the remaining species showing a high level of stability. Using community traits and composition for resident species we demonstrate native warmwater species have become more dominant along the waterfront in recent years, suggesting that restoration efforts are functioning as intended. Additionally, piscivore and specialist species have increased in their relative biomass contribution, approaching existing restoration targets. Altogether this waterfront-wide evaluation allows us to detect overall changes along the waterfront and can be beneficial to understand community changes at an ecosystem level when implementing and monitoring restoration projects.

Indexed as

EcosystemFishesAnimalsAnimals, WildBiomassConservation of Natural ResourcesWetlands

Identifiers

PMID38408042
PMCPMC10896508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.