ArticleJAMA network open2024
Cost of Care for Newborns With Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome in a State Medicaid Program.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of stochastic vibro-tactile stimulation for newborns at risk of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome.Pediatric research · 2026Trial
- Neonatal abstinence syndrome: a case series from Colombo-Sri Lanka.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Monitoring Opioid-Use-Disorder Treatment Adherence Using Smartwatch Gesture Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A human iPSC-derived midbrain neural stem cell model of prenatal opioid exposure and withdrawal: A proof of concept study.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is a medical condition among neonates experiencing substance withdrawal due to the mother's substance use during pregnancy. While previous studies suggest that the overall incidence and annual costs of NAS are increasing, to date, the long-term costs have yet to be demonstrated in Medicaid populations. Objective: To examine the demographic differences and long-term costs of care for neonates diagnosed with vs not diagnosed with NAS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used claims data from the Alabama Medicaid Agency for neonates born to Medicaid-eligible mothers between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020. Data were analyzed in June 2022. Exposure: A diagnosis of NAS within 30 days of birth. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rate of NAS by demographic and birth characteristics, long-term costs attributable to NAS status and demographic and birth characteristics, and distribution of this expenditure over the enrollment period. Results: A total of 346 259 neonates with Medicaid eligibility were born during the study period (mean [SD] gestational age, 38.4 [2.2] weeks; 50.5%, male), 4027 (1.2%) of whom had an NAS diagnosis within 30 days of birth. A larger percentage of neonates with an NAS diagnosis were male (52.7%) than in the group without NAS (50.5%). Neonates with NAS also weighed less at birth (mean difference, -212.0 g; 95% CI, -231.1 to -192.8 g) and had older mothers (mean difference, 3.4 years; 95% CI, 2.6-4.2 years). An NAS diagnosis had an estimated additional cost of $17 921 (95% CI, $14 830-$21 012) over the enrollment period, and this cost was not evenly distributed over that period. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of neonates born into the Alabama Medicaid population, those with an NAS diagnosis had a different demographic profile and a higher cost to state Medicaid agencies than those without NAS. These findings warrant further effort to reduce the occurrence of NAS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.