Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38407819›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2024

Contrasting biomass allocations explain adaptations to cold and drought in the world's highest-growing angiosperms.

Jiří Doležal, Thinles Chondol, Zuzana Chlumská, Jan Altman, Kateřina Čapková, Miroslav Dvorský, Pavel Fibich, Kirill A Korznikov, Adam T Ruka, Martin Kopecký and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiří DoležalInstitute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Science, Průhonice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5829-4051
Thinles ChondolInstitute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Science, Průhonice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1054-9980
Zuzana ChlumskáInstitute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Science, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
Jan AltmanInstitute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Science, Průhonice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-4879-5773
Kateřina ČapkováInstitute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Science, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
Miroslav DvorskýInstitute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Science, Průhonice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0194-8189
Pavel FibichInstitute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Science, Průhonice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9066-3753
Kirill A KorznikovInstitute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Science, Průhonice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2850-1483
Adam T RukaInstitute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Science, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
Martin KopeckýInstitute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Science, Průhonice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-1018-9316
Martin MacekInstitute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Science, Průhonice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5609-5921
Klára ŘehákováInstitute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Science, Průhonice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8871-9989
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany · CZUniversity of South Bohemia in České Budějovice · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsUnderstanding biomass allocation among plant organs is crucial for comprehending plant growth optimization, survival and responses to the drivers of global change. Yet, the mechanisms governing mass allocation in vascular plants from extreme elevations exposed to cold and drought stresses remain poorly understood. METHODOLOGY: We analysed organ mass weights and fractions in 258 Himalayan herbaceous species across diverse habitats (wetland, steppe, alpine), growth forms (annual, perennial taprooted, rhizomatous and cushiony) and climatic gradients (3500-6150 m elevation) to explore whether biomass distribution adhered to fixed allometric or optimal partitioning rules, and how variations in size, phylogeny and ecological preferences influence their strategies for resource allocation. KEY

findingsFollowing optimal partitioning theory, Himalayan plants distribute more biomass to key organs vital for acquiring and preserving limited resources necessary for their growth and survival. Allocation strategies are mainly influenced by plant growth forms and habitat conditions, notably temperature, water availability and evaporative demands. Alpine plants invest primarily in below-ground stem bases for storage and regeneration, reducing above-ground stems while increasing leaf mass fraction to maximize carbon assimilation in their short growing season. Conversely, arid steppe plants prioritize deep roots over leaves to secure water and minimize transpiration. Wetland plants allocate resources to above-ground stems and below-ground rhizomes, enabling them to resist competition and grazing in fertile environments.

conclusionsHimalayan plants from extreme elevations optimize their allocation strategies to acquire scarce resources under specific conditions, efficiently investing carbon from supportive to acquisitive and protective functions with increasing cold and drought. Intraspecific variation and shared ancestry have not significantly altered biomass allocation strategies of Himalayan plants. Despite diverse evolutionary histories, plants from similar habitats have developed comparable phenotypic structures to adapt to their specific environments. This study offers new insights into plant adaptations in diverse Himalayan environments and underscores the importance of efficient resource allocation for survival and growth in challenging conditions.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBiomassCold TemperatureDroughtsMagnoliopsidaEcosystemallometric partitioning theoryBiomass allocationenvironmental gradientsHimalayasoptimal partitioning theoryphylogeny

Identifiers

PMID38407819
PMCPMC11341669
OpenAlexW4392154882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.