Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38407735›Full record

ArticleFish physiology and biochemistry2024

The crosstalk between photoperiod and early mild stress on juvenile oscar (Astronotus ocellatus) after acute stress.

Mahyar Zare, Mohammad Kazempour, Seyedeh Mahsa Hosseini Choupani, Sobhan R Akhavan, Michael Salini, Artur Rombenso, Noah Esmaeili

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Fish physiology and biochemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Mahyar ZareFaculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Institute of Aquaculture and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Na Sádkách, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Mohammad KazempourDepartment of Microbiology, Pathobiology & Basic Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
Seyedeh Mahsa Hosseini ChoupaniDepartment of Fisheries, Faculty of Marine Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran.
Sobhan R AkhavanNelson Marlborough Institute of Technology, 322 Hardy Street, Private Bag 19, Nelson, New Zealand.
Michael SaliniNutrition and Seafood Laboratory (NuSea.Lab), School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3225, Australia.
Artur RombensoCSIRO, Agriculture and Food, Livestock & Aquaculture Program, Bribie Island Research Centre, Bribie Island, QLD, Australia.
Noah EsmaeiliInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, 15-21 Nubeena Cres, Hobart, Taroona, TAS, 7053, Australia. noah.esmaeili@utas.edu.au.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUDeakin University · AUNelson Marlborough Institute of Technology · NZRazi University · IRTarbiat Modares University · IRUniversity of South Bohemia in České Budějovice · CZUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early mild stress (EMS) is like preparedness and might help fish deal with stress appropriately. This study investigated how EMS and photoperiod changes can impact growth, haematology, blood biochemistry, immunological response, antioxidant system, liver enzymes, and stress response of oscar (Astronotus ocellatus; 7.29 ± 0.96 g) before and after acute confinement stress (AC stress). Ten experimental treatments included five different photoperiods 8L16D (08:16 light to dark), 12L12D (12:12 light to dark), 16L8D (16:08 light to dark), 20L4D (20:04 light to dark), and 24L0D (24:00 light to dark), and these five photoperiod schedules were conducted in an EMS condition. After 9 weeks, no significant differences were found in growth parameters, survival rate, and body composition. At the end of the experiment and after AC stress, fish farmed in 24 light hours had the lowest haematocrit, white blood cells, total protein, blood performance, lysozyme, immunoglobulin M, complement C3, superoxide dismutase, and catalase. Fish that experienced EMS had significantly higher survival rates than those farmed in normal conditions (80.67% vs 61.33%). In conclusion, considering all measured parameters, 8-h light can be suggested as an optimum photoperiod for this fish species. Under 24L0D (no EMS) conditions, there were many negative effects apparent. In addition, a positive effect of EMS was evident in terms of survival after AC stress. AC stress decreased some health parameters under 24-h light treatment, while these results were not observed in EMS-exposed fish. Therefore, the EMS schedule can be a useful tool in preventing the negative effects of stress.

Indexed as

PhotoperiodStress, PhysiologicalAnimalsAntioxidant responseBlood biochemistryBlood performanceContinuous lightStress physiology

Identifiers

PMID38407735
OpenAlexW4392167431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.