Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38407719›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and global health2024

Factors Associated with Inappropriate Use of Antibiotics Among Animal Health Professionals in Selected Districts of Rwanda, 2021.

Denyse Mugwaneza, Edson Rwagasore, Ziad El-Khatib, Pierre Dukuziyaturemye, Jared Omolo, Olivier Nsekuye, Samuel Rwunganira, Maximillian Manzi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Denyse MugwanezaRwanda Biomedical Center (RBC), Kigali, Rwanda.
Edson RwagasoreRwanda Biomedical Center (RBC), Kigali, Rwanda.
Ziad El-KhatibDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. ziad.el-khatib@ki.se.
Pierre DukuziyaturemyeUniversity of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Jared OmoloCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Kigali, Rwanda.
Olivier NsekuyeRwanda Biomedical Center (RBC), Kigali, Rwanda.
Samuel RwunganiraAfrican Field Epidemiology Network (AFENET), Kigali, Rwanda.
Maximillian ManziRwanda Agriculture and Animal Resources Development Board, Kigali, Rwanda.
Rwanda Biomedical Center · RWAfrican Field Epidemiology Network · UGKarolinska Institutet · SERwanda Agriculture Board · RWUniversity of Rwanda · RW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotic resistance is a global health concern. Humans can acquire antibiotic resistance through human-to-human transmission, from the environment, via the food chain, and through the contact with animals. The National Action Plan on antimicrobial resistance 2020-2024 highlights the prudent use of antibiotics in veterinary activities as the key element in keeping antibiotics effective. We determined the factors associated with misuse of antibiotics among animal health professionals in Rwanda.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study that enrolled animal health field professionals from five districts, where stratified random sampling was used to select one district by each province of Rwanda. Structured questions were used during face-to-face interviews. The misuse of antibiotics was defined as the use of antibiotics for reasons other than treatment, the non-completion of required courses, or the use of a high dose (i.e., an overdose) of antibiotics. We collected socio-demographic data of respondents, as well as elementary knowledge and perceptions on veterinary antibiotics and antibiotic resistance. A backward stepwise logistic regression model was used to identify the factors that were predictive of the inappropriate use of antibiotics.

resultsThere were 256 respondents to the survey. Of those, 198 were male and 58 were female. Almost three quarters of respondents (n = 174/256; 68%) reported the misuse of antibiotics at least once in the previous 12 months. The final logistic regression analysis identified the following factors to be predictive of antibiotics misuse: aged ≤ 24 years (aOR 0.92; 95% CI [0.88, 0.96]; p < 0.001); low trust in veterinary antibiotics available in the local market (aOR 8.45; 95% CI [4.18, 17.07]; p < 0.01), insufficient knowledge about basic understanding of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance (aOR 2.78; 95% CI [1.38, 5.58], p < 0.01) and not acquiring any continuing education (aOR 1.97; 95% CI [1.02, 4.19]; p = 0.04).

conclusionsThis study identified inadequate perceptions of proper antibiotic use among animal health professionals. There is a need for continuous education on appropriate antibiotic use among animal health professionals to lessen the negative impact of antibiotic resistance on public health security.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAdultAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInappropriate PrescribingMaleMiddle AgedRwandaSurveys and QuestionnairesVeterinariansYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnimal health professionalsAntibiotic resistancePublic health

Identifiers

PMID38407719
PMCPMC11176279
OpenAlexW4392168817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.