ArticleEndocrine2024
"Eve is not Adam" - differences in efficacy, safety and clinical outcomes with lipoprotein apheresis between sexes.
Article in Endocrine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH), female atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease occurs 20 years earlier than in women without FH. The aim of this study is to describe the differences in lipoprotein apheresis (LA), a last therapeutic option, in terms of efficacy, safety and clinical outcomes between the two sexes. MATERIALS AND
methodsSex related differences were analysed in 31 subjects in on LA treatment with FH and not achieving LDL-cholesterol and/or Lp(a) target values on maximum lipid-lowering therapies. Moreover, sex related differences in time to major cardiovascular event (MACE) was investigated in 68 subjects, with at least one year of follow-up.
resultsAmong the 31 patients currently undergoing LA treatment who did not achieve LDL-cholesterol and/or Lp(a) target values, no differences in comorbidity were recorded despite a worse pre-LA treatment lipid profile (LDL-C 77 ± 60 mg/dl in males vs. 128 ± 105 mg/dl in females; p 0.025) and a longer mean inter-apheresis interval (17 ± 4 days in males vs. 19 ± 5 days in females; p 0.012) reported in females compared to males. Additionally, in comparison with men, it was found that the time between the first cardiovascular event and the beginning of LA, as well as the age at the beginning of LA, were significantly higher in females than in males (p 0.027 and 0.007, respectively).
conclusionsSex differences in FH subjects not only affect the diagnosis and treatment but also influence varied responses to the treatment itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.