Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38407644›Full record

ReviewNano convergence2024

Materials descriptors of machine learning to boost development of lithium-ion batteries.

Zehua Wang, Li Wang, Hao Zhang, Hong Xu, Xiangming He

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nano convergence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zehua WangInstitute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Li WangInstitute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Hao ZhangInstitute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Hong XuInstitute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Xiangming HeInstitute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China. hexm@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7146-4097

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2019YFA0705703National Natural Science Foundation of China 22279070National Natural Science Foundation of China U21A20170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional methods for developing new materials are no longer sufficient to meet the needs of the human energy transition. Machine learning (ML) artificial intelligence (AI) and advancements have caused materials scientists to realize that using AI/ML to accelerate the development of new materials for batteries is a powerful potential tool. Although the use of certain fixed properties of materials as descriptors to act as a bridge between the two separate disciplines of AI and materials chemistry has been widely investigated, many of the descriptors lack universality and accuracy due to a lack of understanding of the mechanisms by which AI/ML operates. Therefore, understanding the underlying operational mechanisms and learning logic of AI/ML has become mandatory for materials scientists to develop more accurate descriptors. To address those challenges, this paper reviews previous work on AI, machine learning and materials descriptors and introduces the basic logic of AI and machine learning to help materials developers understand their operational mechanisms. Meanwhile, the paper also compares the accuracy of different descriptors and their advantages and disadvantages and highlights the great potential value of accurate descriptors in AI/machine learning applications for battery research, as well as the challenges of developing accurate material descriptors.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceLithium battery development toolsLithium-ion battery material descriptorsMachine learningNovel material development

Identifiers

PMID38407644
PMCPMC10897104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.