Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38407612›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Open airway surgery for post-COVID laryngotracheal stenosis.

Lluís Nisa, Hajdi Leroyer, Kishore Sandu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lluís NisaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Hajdi LeroyerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Kishore SanduDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland. kishore.sandu@chuv.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1977-4551
University of Lausanne · CHUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study reports our experience with open reconstructive surgery in patients with laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) following prolonged intubation and/or tracheostomy in the context of COVID-19.

methodsAll patients underwent a preoperative endoscopic airway assessment. Posterior glottic lesions were graded according to the Bogdasarian classification, subglottic-tracheal lesions according to the Cotton-Myers classification and postoperative complications reported by the Clavien-Dindo classification. We report postoperative outcomes and functional results in this patient subset.

resultsWe include 14 patients diagnosed to have post COVID LTS, one female and 13 males. This group was compared with a control group, diagnosed with LTS following prolonged intubation. In the COVID group, mean age of patients at the time of the airway surgery was 52.1 ± 16.8 years (range: 13.7-76.3). More than half the patients were multi-morbid with hypertension and obesity being the most common conditions. Eleven patients had multi-site stenoses. Open surgical interventions performed were tracheal resection and anastomosis, laryngotracheal reconstruction and extended cricotracheal resection, and postoperative complications were seen in 12 (85.6%) patients. 70% patients with pre-existing tracheostomy were decannulated. Oral swallowing was not tolerated in one-fifth of the patients and a significant number of them have poor voice quality.

conclusionPost-COVID pandemic, airway surgeons are seeing an increased number of patients with complex LTS, and we report significant postoperative complications in this patient subset. Decannulation rates, voice and swallowing results are poor in patients with glottic involvement as compared to isolated tracheal stenosis.

Indexed as

COVID-19LaryngostenosisTracheal StenosisAdolescentAdultAgedConstriction, PathologicFemaleHumansIntubationMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAirway stenosisCOVIDLaryngotracheal stenosis

Identifiers

PMID38407612
PMCPMC11024014
OpenAlexW4392169330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.