Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38406799›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2024

Addition of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Juan Yang, Chen Liu, Yaru Guo, Wenwen Guo, Xiaojin Wu

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juan YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Xuzhou Municipal Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Chen LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Xuzhou Municipal Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Yaru GuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Xuzhou Municipal Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Wenwen GuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Xuzhou Municipal Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Xiaojin WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Xuzhou Municipal Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Xuzhou Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In recent years, the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) to chemotherapy (CT) has become a research hotspot in the therapy of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Nevertheless, controversial results have been revealed among the published randomized controlled trials. Hence, a meta-analysis was performed to assess the therapeutic effect of this treatment regimen. Methods: Five English databases (PubMed, WOS, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Embase), and four Chinese databases (CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang), as well as oncological meetings, were systematically searched to identify eligible studies that assessed the addition of ICI to CT versus CT alone in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. The pooled hazard ratios (HR) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using fixed- or random-effect model. Subgroup analyses were also performed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and PD-L1-positive individuals. Results: All told there are five eligible randomized controlled trials involving 3,000 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. Compared with CT alone, the ICI plus CT regimen significantly increased PFS in the ITT (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73-0.88) and PD-L1-positive (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.62-0.79) populations, as well as OS in the ITT (HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81-0.97) and PD-L1-positive populations (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.71-0.91). Moreover, the PFS of sufferers treated with the combination strategy of ICI with CT increased alongside PD-L1 enrichment. A clinical benefit in terms of objective response rate was also distinctly observed in both populations treated with ICI plus CT. In the subgroup analysis, patients in the no prior CT subgroup experienced a striking increase in PFS in both populations; however, a difference was not observed in other subgroups. Conclusions: The combination strategy striking improves PFS and OS in both ITT and PD-L1-positive populations, and PFS is prolonged with PD-L1 enrichment. Patients who do not receive CT prior to this treatment are associated with longer PFS in both populations. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42021289817.

Indexed as

chemotherapyimmune checkpoint inhibitorsmeta-analysisPD-1/PD-L1systematic reviewtriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID38406799
PMCPMC10884307
OpenAlexW4391689418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.