Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38406647›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2024

Stabilised Hyaluronic Acid (sHA) gel as a novel marker for breast cancer tumour bed cavity: Surgical feasibility.

Janice Yeh, Grace Chew, Suat Li Ng, Wei Ming Ooi, Su-Wen Loh, Anthony Hyett, Tristan Leech, Elaine Bevington, Jenny Huynh, Jenny Sim and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Janice YehDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Victoria, Australia.
Grace ChewDepartment of Breast Surgery, Austin Health, Victoria, Australia.
Suat Li NgDepartment of Breast Surgery, Austin Health, Victoria, Australia.
Wei Ming OoiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Austin Health, Victoria, Australia.
Su-Wen LohDepartment of Breast Surgery, Austin Health, Victoria, Australia.
Anthony HyettDepartment of Breast Surgery, Austin Health, Victoria, Australia.
Tristan LeechDepartment of Breast Surgery, Austin Health, Victoria, Australia.
Elaine BevingtonDepartment of Breast Surgery, Austin Health, Victoria, Australia.
Jenny HuynhDepartment of Breast Surgery, Austin Health, Victoria, Australia.
Jenny SimDepartment of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Farshad ForoudiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Victoria, Australia.
Sweet Ping NgDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Victoria, Australia.
Michael ChaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Victoria, Australia.
Austin Health · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUMonash University · AUOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUSt Vincent’s Private Hospital Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Consistent delineation of the breast conserving surgery (BCS) tumour bed (TB) for breast cancer remains a challenge for radiation oncologists. Accurate delineation allows for better local control and reduces toxicity when planning partial breast or TB boost radiation therapy (RT). Methods: In the operating theatre (OT) breast surgeons inserted stabilised hyaluronic acid (sHA) gel as small drops approximately one cm into the walls surrounding the resection cavity. Surgical feasibility was determined by the rate of successful sHA gel insertion procedure, the ease of insertion as rated by surgeons, the time required for insertion procedure, the quantity used, and any adverse events (AE) relating to sHA gel insertion. Results: Thirty-five patients were enrolled. All patients underwent sHA gel insertion successfully. The procedure added a median of 2.8 min to the OT time and was rated as 'easy' in 89 % of patients. There were no immediate AE in OT. Five (14 %) patients experienced a grade 2 or higher AE. Three of the five patients were prescribed oral antibiotics for breast infection. Two of the five patients experienced a grade 3 AE - haematoma which required evacuation in OT day 1 post-BCS, and infected seroma which required drainage and washout in OT 2 months post-BCS. All five patients recovered and underwent the planned adjuvant therapies for their BC. The AE data reflects common risks with standard BCS and are not clearly attributed to sHA gel insertion alone. Conclusion: We show that sHA gel is surgically feasible as a marker to help define the TB cavity for post-BCS adjuvant MRI-based RT planning.

Indexed as

Breast cancer tumor bed radiotherapyHyaluronic acid gel fiducial markerSurgical feasibility

Identifiers

PMID38406647
PMCPMC10885548
OpenAlexW4391941847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.