Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38406586›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024

Enhancing regeneration and repair of long-distance peripheral nerve defect injuries with continuous microcurrent electrical nerve stimulation.

Junjie Kong, Cheng Teng, Fenglan Liu, Xuzhaoyu Wang, Yi Zhou, Ying Zong, Zixin Wan, Jun Qin, Bin Yu, Daguo Mi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Junjie Kong *Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Affiliated Hospital and Medical School, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Cheng Teng *Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Affiliated Hospital and Medical School, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Fenglan LiuKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Affiliated Hospital and Medical School, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Xuzhaoyu WangKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Affiliated Hospital and Medical School, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Yi ZhouDepartment of Orthopedics, Nantong City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nantong, China.
Ying ZongKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Affiliated Hospital and Medical School, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Zixin WanKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Affiliated Hospital and Medical School, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Jun QinKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Affiliated Hospital and Medical School, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Bin YuKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Affiliated Hospital and Medical School, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Daguo MiDepartment of Orthopedics, Nantong City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nantong, China.
Yaxian WangKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Affiliated Hospital and Medical School, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Peripheral nerve injuries, especially those involving long-distance deficits, pose significant challenges in clinical repair. This study explores the potential of continuous microcurrent electrical nerve stimulation (cMENS) as an adjunctive strategy to promote regeneration and repair in such cases. Methods: The study initially optimized cMENS parameters and assessed its impact on Schwann cell activity, neurotrophic factor secretion, and the nerve regeneration microenvironment. Subsequently, a rat sciatic nerve defect-bridge repair model was employed to evaluate the reparative effects of cMENS as an adjuvant treatment. Functional recovery was assessed through gait analysis, motor function tests, and nerve conduction assessments. Additionally, nerve regeneration and denervated muscle atrophy were observed through histological examination. Results: The study identified a 10-day regimen of 100uA microcurrent stimulation as optimal. Evaluation focused on Schwann cell activity and the microenvironment, revealing the positive impact of cMENS on maintaining denervated Schwann cell proliferation and enhancing neurotrophic factor secretion. In the rat model of sciatic nerve defect-bridge repair, cMENS demonstrated superior effects compared to control groups, promoting motor function recovery, nerve conduction, and sensory and motor neuron regeneration. Histological examinations revealed enhanced maturation of regenerated nerve fibers and reduced denervated muscle atrophy. Discussion: While cMENS shows promise as an adjuvant treatment for long-distance nerve defects, future research should explore extended stimulation durations and potential synergies with tissue engineering grafts to improve outcomes. This study contributes comprehensive evidence supporting the efficacy of cMENS in enhancing peripheral nerve regeneration.

Indexed as

continuous microcurrent electrical nerve stimulationfunctional recoverylong-distance nerve defectsperipheral nerve injurySchwann cell activitytissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID38406586
PMCPMC10885699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.