ReviewEJHaem2024
The use of Ambroxol for the treatment of Gaucher disease: A systematic review.
Review in EJHaem, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phenotypic Spectrum of Type 2-3 Gaucher Disease: A Case Study in the Balkan Genotype.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
- Impact of ER stress and the unfolded protein response on Fabry disease.EBioMedicine · 2025Review
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of ambroxol for the treatment of Chinese patients with Gaucher disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring the long-term use of ambroxol in Gaucher disease type 2: insights from two pediatric cases.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- An Overview of Gaucher Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gaucher disease (GD) is a heterogeneous condition requiring tailored treatment approaches. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise and evaluate current evidence pertaining to the use of Ambroxol for the treatment of GD. Published and unpublished literature databases, conference proceedings and the reference lists of included studies were searched until 23 November 2023. A narrative synthesis was performed. Database search and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Twenty-one studies (182 patients) were included. The evidence was low in quality. Variable responses to Ambroxol were observed. Response rates were 36% and 55% in two studies reporting on type 1 GD. One study found a 22% response rate in type 2 GD, whereas another study found 29% of patients with type 3 GD reported neurological improvements. No severe adverse events were reported in the literature, with mild and reversible side effects reported. Varying response rates are to be expected (29%-100%) when treating neurological manifestations. Varying degrees of symptomatic improvement for the treatment of GD were noted in the literature. Multidisciplinary team input and clinical judgement are advised to provide personalized treatment of this complex and multi-faceted condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.