ReviewEJHaem2024
Does Caplacizumab for the management of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura increase the risk of relapse, exacerbation, and bleeding? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis based on revised criteria by the International Working Group for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.
Review in EJHaem, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hemostasis-Sparing Antiplatelet Therapy: Current Concepts and Emerging Targets in Arterial Thrombosis.Biomolecules & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Cost-Effectiveness and Value of Information Analyses of Caplacizumab for the Treatment of Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura in Brazil.Applied health economics and health policy · 2025Article
- Prevalence and characteristics of acute ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura and immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological research and practice · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of caplacizumab in immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in the United States.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare and life-threatening condition marked by abnormal blood clotting and organ damage. Caplacizumab is a potential treatment for the TTP management. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess Caplacizumab's effectiveness and safety in the TTP management. A comprehensive database search identified nine studies, including randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Primary outcomes included TTP exacerbation, relapse, and major bleeding. Major bleeding risk was evaluated using updated definitions recommended by the International TTP Working Group in 2021. Revised criteria proposed by the IWG for TTP recurrence were employed for a comprehensive assessment of Caplacizumab's impact on relapse and exacerbation. Analysis revealed Caplacizumab significantly reduced all-cause mortality in TTP patients. Some studies raised concerns about bleeding risk, but overall, it did not significantly differ from standard treatment. Likewise, there was no significant difference in TTP relapse rates between Caplacizumab and standard care. This study supports Caplacizumab as a potential adjunct therapy for TTP. However, careful consideration of its advantages and risks is crucial in clinical practice. Further research is needed to address concerns related to adverse effects like bleeding risk and relapse rates associated with Caplacizumab in the TTP management. The findings emphasize the importance of weighing potential benefits and risks when considering Caplacizumab as an adjunct therapy for TTP.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.