ArticleEJHaem2024
The potential of 3rd-generation nanopore sequencing for B-cell clonotyping in lymphoproliferative disorders.
Article in EJHaem, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of Rapid Clonotyping of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Using Flongle Flow-Cell Nanopore Sequencing of IGH Rearrangements.European journal of haematology · 2025Article
- De novo antibody identification in human blood from full-length single B cell transcriptomics and matching haplotype-resolved germline assemblies.Genome research · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lymphoid malignancies are characterized by clonal cell expansion, often identifiable by unique immunoglobulin rearrangements. Heavy (IGH) and light-chain gene usage offers diagnostic insights and enables sensitive residual disease detection via next-generation sequencing. With its adaptable throughput and variable read lengths, Oxford Nanopore thirdgeneration sequencing now holds promise for clonotyping. This study analyzed CD138+ plasma-cell DNA from eight multiple myeloma patients, comparing clonotyping performance between Nanopore sequencing, Illumina MiSeq, and Ion Torrent S5. We demonstrated clonotype consistency across platforms through Smith-Waterman local alignment of nanopore reads. The mean clonal percentage of IGH V and J gene usage in the CD138+ cells was 69% for Nanopore, 67% for S5, and 76% for MiSeq. When aligned with known clonotypes, clonal cells averaged a 91% similarity, exceeding 85%. In summary, Nanopore sequencing, with its capacity for generating millions of high-quality reads, proves effective for detecting clonal IGH rearrangements. This versatile platform offers the potential for measuring residual disease down to a sensitivity level of 10
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.