Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38406514›Full record

ArticleEJHaem2024

Changes in bone marrow fibrosis during momelotinib or ruxolitinib therapy do not correlate with efficacy outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis.

Stephen T Oh, Srdan Verstovsek, Vikas Gupta, Uwe Platzbecker, Timothy Devos, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, Donal P McLornan, Andrew Perkins, Maria Laura Fox, Mary Frances McMullin and 8 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJHaem, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01969838 (A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Active-controlled Study Evaluating Momelotinib vs. Ruxolitinib in Subjects With Primary Myelofibrosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01969838 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Active-controlled Study Evaluating Momelotinib vs. Ruxolitinib in Subjects With Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF) or Post-Polycythemia Vera or Post-Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis (Post-PV/ET MF)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSierra Oncology LLC - a GSK companyRan2013 to 2019Enrolled432ConditionsPrimary Myelofibrosis, Post-Polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis, Post-Essential Thrombocythemia MyelofibrosisArmsMomelotinib, Ruxolitinib, Placebo to match momelotinib, Placebo to match ruxolitinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Challenging Dogma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Prognostic and Predictive Models in Myelofibrosis.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 16 institutions in 12 countries.

Stephen T OhDivision of Hematology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8564-5400
Srdan VerstovsekDepartment of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.
Vikas GuptaDepartment of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University of Toronto Toronto Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1419-8607
Uwe PlatzbeckerClinic of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, and Hemostaseology University of Leipzig Medical Center Leipzig Germany.
Timothy DevosMicrobiology, and Immunology, Laboratory of Molecular Immunology (Rega Institute) Department of Hematology, University Hospitals Leuven and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Laboratory of Molecular Immunology (Rega Institute), KU Leuven Leuven Belgium.
Jean-Jacques KiladjianUniversité Paris Cité, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques Paris France.
Donal P McLornanDepartment of Haematology Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and University College Hospital London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1224-091X
Andrew PerkinsAustralian Centre for Blood Diseases Monash University Melbourne Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3644-7093
Maria Laura FoxDepartment of Haematology Vall d'Hebron University Hospital Barcelona Spain.
Mary Frances McMullinCentre for Medical Education Queen's University Belfast UK.
Adam J MeadMRC Molecular Haematology Unit MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine NIHR Biomedical Research Centre University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Miklos EgyedDepartment of Hematology Somogy County Kaposi Mór General Hospital Kaposvár Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5513-5880
Jiri MayerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic.
Tomasz SachaDepartment of Hematology Jagiellonian University Hospital Kraków Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7207-6595
Jun KawashimaSierra Oncology, a GSK company San Mateo California USA.
Mei HuangSierra Oncology, a GSK company San Mateo California USA.
Bryan StrouseSierra Oncology, a GSK company San Mateo California USA.
Ruben MesaAtrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center Wake Forest University School of Medicine Winston-Salem North Carolina USA.
Sierra Engineering (United States) · USAtrium Health Wake Forest Baptist · USHebron University · PSJagiellonian University · PLMasaryk University · CZMonash Medical Centre · AUMRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBRega Institute for Medical Research · BESomogy Megyei Kaposi Mór Oktató Kórház · HUThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity College Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DEUniversity of Toronto · CAWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 26988Cancer Research UK 27723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) is a pathological feature of myelofibrosis, with higher grades associated with poor prognosis. Limited data exist on the association between outcomes and BMF changes. We present BMF data from Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor-naive patients from SIMPLIFY-1 (NCT01969838), a double-blind, randomized, phase 3 study of momelotinib vs ruxolitinib. Baseline and week 24 bone marrow biopsies were graded from 0 to 3 as per World Health Organization criteria. Other assessments included Total Symptom Score, spleen volume, transfusion independence status, and hemoglobin levels. Paired samples were available from 144 and 160 patients randomized to momelotinib and ruxolitinib. With momelotinib and ruxolitinib, transfusion independence was achieved by 87% and 44% of patients with BMF improvement of ≥1 grade and 76% and 56% of those with stable/worsening BMF; there was no association between BMF changes and transfusion independence for either arm (momelotinib,

Indexed as

bone marrow fibrosisJAK inhibitormomelotinibmyelofibrosisruxolitinib

Identifiers

PMID38406514
PMCPMC10887367
OpenAlexW4391611819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.