Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38406430›Full record

SynthesisMedEdPublish (2016)2017

The role of 3D printing in anatomy education and surgical training: A narrative review.

Ka Hou Christien Li, Christopher Kui, Elgin Kah Meng Lee, Cheuk Sang Ho, Sunny Hei Wong, William Wu, Wing Tak Wong, Jessika Voll, Guangping Li, Tong Liu and 4 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in MedEdPublish (2016), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The influence of 3D printing on inter- and intrarater reliability on the classification of tibial plateau fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ka Hou Christien LiNewcastle University.
Christopher KuiNewcastle University.
Elgin Kah Meng LeeNewcastle University.
Cheuk Sang HoChinese University of Hong Kong.
Sunny Hei WongChinese University of Hong Kong.
William WuChinese University of Hong Kong.
Wing Tak WongChinese University of Hong Kong.
Jessika VollNewcastle upon Tyne Northern Deanery.
Guangping LiTianjin Medical University.
Tong LiuTianjin Medical University.
Bryan YanChinese University of Hong Kong.
Jessica ChanUniversity of Oxford.
Gary TseChinese University of Hong Kong.
Iain D KeenanNewcastle University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Recent expansions in the development and availability of three-dimensional printing (3Dp) have led to the uptake of this valuable and effective technology within the modern context of medical education. It is proposed that 3Dp is entirely appropriate for the creation of anatomical models for purposes of teaching and training due to the ability of this technology to produce accurate 3D physical representations based on a processed data set acquired from sources including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT). When investigating the currently available educational research with respect to 3Dp, it is important that the best evidence supporting the practical and theoretical benefits of this technology in teaching and training can be identified, while any obstacles to the effective implementation of 3Dp can also be determined. Here, literature describing recent primary research with respect to the capability and utility of 3Dp in anatomy and surgery have been explored in a narrative review. The impact on resources of implementing this technology within medical education have also been investigated. In order to emphasise wider applications in medicine, the role of 3Dp in medical practice and research have also been examined. To identify recent literature appropriate for this review published up to March 2017, suitable search terms were determined and applied using PubMed and results were judged against an established checklist. The research identified was then allocated with respect to the agreed topic areas of anatomy education, surgical training, medical usage and medical research. A student partnership approach was utilised for this review and the focus of the work was driven by undergraduate students in collaboration with anatomy and medical educators. Preliminary findings from this narrative review support the implementation of 3Dp in anatomy education and surgical training as a supplement to traditional learning approaches.

Indexed as

3D-printingAnatomyPostgraduate TrainingSurgeryUndergraduate Education

Identifiers

PMID38406430
PMCPMC10885259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.