ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2024
Role of simulation-based training in thoracic anaesthesia.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Simulation-based training (SBT) aims to acquire technical and non-technical skills in a simulated fashion without harming the patient. Simulation helps the anaesthesiologist acquire procedural competence and non-technical abilities. In thoracic anaesthesia, various simulators are available with varying degrees of fidelity and costs. Apart from improving bronchoscopy-related skills, other potential applications of SBT include the practice of lung isolation in normal and difficult airway scenarios, troubleshooting complications during surgeries, and certification of the proficiency of anaesthesiologists. A pragmatic approach is required for choosing the simulator based on its availability, cost, and benefits. Although the literature supports SBT to improve procedural skills, retention of the skills and their translation into improving clinical outcomes remain largely unproven. Randomised, controlled studies targeting the effect of SBT on the improvement of clinical outcomes of patients are needed to prove their worth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.