Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38406295›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

AMMI and GGE biplot analysis for genotype × environment interactions affecting the yield and quality characteristics of sugar beet.

Xinwang Dang, Xiaohang Hu, Yahuai Ma, Yanli Li, Wenliang Kan, Xinjiu Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xinwang DangAcademy of Modern Agriculture and Ecology Environment, Heilongjiang University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Xiaohang HuAcademy of Modern Agriculture and Ecology Environment, Heilongjiang University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Yahuai MaAcademy of Modern Agriculture and Ecology Environment, Heilongjiang University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Yanli LiAcademy of Modern Agriculture and Ecology Environment, Heilongjiang University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Wenliang KanHeilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Reclamation Sciences, Qiqihar, Heilongjiang, China.
Xinjiu DongCash Crop Research Institute of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Science, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.

Funding

National Sugar Industry Technical System Decomposition Project “Research on Sugar Beet Ferti-lization Decision-making Model Based on UAV Remote Sensing Technology”Research on soil improvement and carbon emission in black soil area by returning filtered mud from agricultural waste sugar plant to field, Heilongjiang Department of Ecology and Environment
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sugar beet, an important sugar crop, contributes significantly to the world's sugar production. However, genotype-environment interactions (GEI) often affect the quality characteristics of sugar beet. Hence, understanding the effects of GEI on sugar beet quality can aid in identifying high-quality genotypes that can adapt to different environments. Traditional variance analysis can only be used to examine the yield of a variety and not its specific adaptability to specific conditions. Therefore, more comprehensive analytical methods are required to evaluate the characteristics of the variety under specific environments. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) and genotype main effect and genotype × environment interaction (GGE) biplot models can be employed to comprehensively evaluate different varieties and address the drawbacks associated with a single evaluation method. Moreover, these models also allow us to explore new varieties more objectively and comprehensively. In this study, the adaptability and stability of 16 sugar beet varieties, in terms of yield and sugar content, were evaluated using AMMI and GGE biplot analysis in seven pilot projects undertaken in 2022. In the assessment of a small but significant proportion of the total GEI variance for the two qualitative traits (yield and sugar content), 80.58% of the variance was explained by the cumulative contribution of IPC1, IPC2, and IPC3. AMMI and GGE biplots clearly highlighted that KWS4207 (G3) exhibited high and stable quality. They also demonstrated that the experiments in Jalaid Banner (Inner Mongolia) (E7) were the most representative. Together, the results suggested that the comprehensive application of AMMI and GGE biplot analysis allowed for a more comprehensive, scientific, and effective evaluation of sugar beet varieties across different regions. The findings offer a theoretical basis for sugar beet breeding and could guide the rational design of experiments for testing new varieties of sugar beet.

Indexed as

AmmiBeta vulgarisGene-Environment InteractionGenotypePlant BreedingSugarsSugarsAMMIGGE biplotQualityStabilitySugar beets

Identifiers

PMID38406295
PMCPMC10894595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.