ArticlePeerJ2024
Proteomic study on nintedanib in gastric cancer cells.
Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Advances in Nanozymes Toward Diabetic Foot Ulcers.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Harnessing TP73‑targeted nintedanib: A novel strategy to halt triple‑negative breast cancer via p53‑PPARα/PI3K‑Akt pathway suppression.International journal of oncology · 2025Article
- Exploring Antifibrotic Strategies for Interstitial Lung Disease in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Narrative Review.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer is a very common gastrointestinal tumor with a high mortality rate. Nintedanib has been shown to significantly reduce tumor cell proliferation and increase apoptosis in gastric cancer cells Methods: The effects of nintedanib on the biological behavior of gastric cancer cells were evaluated. A cytotoxic proliferation assay was performed to estimate the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC Results: This study identified 845 differentially expressed proteins in the nintedanib-treated group (compared to the control group), comprising 526 up-regulated and 319 down-regulated proteins. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that the differentially expressed proteins were primarily enriched in biological pathways for branched-chain amino acid metabolism, steroid biosynthesis, propionate metabolism, fatty acid metabolism, lysosome, peroxisome, and ferroptosis. Key driver analysis revealed that proteins, such as enoyl-CoA hydratase and 3-hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase (EHHADH), isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1), acyl-CoA oxidase 1 (ACOX1), acyl-CoA oxidase 2 (ACOX2), acyl-CoA oxidase 3 (ACOX3), and acetyl-CoA acyltransferase 1 (ACAA1) could be linked with nintedanib action. Conclusion: Nintedanib inhibits the proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of gastric cancer cells. The crossover pathways and protein networks predicted by proteomics should provide more detailed molecular information enabling the use of nintedanib against gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.