Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38406207›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024

EEG multi-domain feature transfer based on sparse regularized Tucker decomposition.

Yunyuan Gao, Congrui Zhang, Jincheng Huang, Ming Meng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yunyuan GaoCollege of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018 Zhejiang People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-2128-2185
Congrui ZhangCollege of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018 Zhejiang People's Republic of China.
Jincheng HuangHDU-ITMO Joint Institute, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018 Zhejiang People's Republic of China.
Ming MengCollege of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018 Zhejiang People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tensor analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) can extract the activity information and the potential interaction between different brain regions. However, EEG data varies between subjects, and the existing tensor decomposition algorithms cannot guarantee that the features across subjects are distributed in the same domain, which leads to the non-objectivity of the classification result and analysis, In addition, traditional Tucker decomposition is prone to the explosion of feature dimensions. To solve these problems, combined with the idea of feature transfer, a novel EEG tensor transfer algorithm, Tensor Subspace Learning based on Sparse Regularized Tucker Decomposition (TSL-SRT), is proposed in this paper. In TSL-SRT, new EEG samples are considered as the target domain and original samples as the source domain. The target features can be obtained by projecting the target tensor to the source feature space to ensure that all features are in the same domain. Furthermore, to solve the problem of dimension explosion caused by TSL-SRT, a redundant EEG features screening algorithm is adopted to eliminate the redundant features, and achieves 77.8%, 73.2% and 75.3% accuracy on three BCI datasets. By visualizing the spatial basic matrix of the feature space, it can be seen that TSL-SRT is effective in extracting the features of active brain regions in the BCI task and it can extract the multi-domain features of different subjects in the same domain simultaneously, which provides a new method for the tensor analysis of EEG.

Indexed as

DecompositionEEGFeature transferTensor subspace learningTucker

Identifiers

PMID38406207
PMCPMC10881956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.