Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38406199›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024

An evaluation of inter-brain EEG coupling methods in hyperscanning studies.

Xiaomeng Xu, Qiuyue Kong, Dan Zhang, Yu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaomeng XuInstitute of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Qiuyue KongSchool of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA USA.
Dan ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yu ZhangInstitute of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0059-270X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

EEG-based hyperscanning technology has been increasingly applied to analyze interpersonal interactions in social neuroscience in recent years. However, different methods are employed in various of studies without a complete investigation of the suitability of these methods. Our study aimed to systematically compare typical inter-brain EEG coupling methods, with simulated EEG data generated by real EEG data. In particular, two critical metrics of noise level and time delay were manipulated, and three different coupling models were tested. The results revealed that: (1) under certain conditions, various methods were leveraged by noise level and time delay, leading to different performances; (2) most algorithms achieved better experimental results and performance under high coupling degree; (3) with our simulation process, temporal and spectral models showed relatively good results, while data simulated with phase coupling model performed worse. This is the first systematic comparison of typical inter-brain EEG coupling methods, with simulated EEG data generated by real EEG data from different subjects. Existing methods mainly focused on intra-brain coupling. To our knowledge, there was only one previous study that compared five inter-brain EEG coupling methods (Burgess in Front Human Neurosci 7:881, 2013). However, the simulated data used in this study were generated time series with varied degrees of phase coupling without considering any EEG characteristics. For future research, appropriate methods need to be selected based on possible underlying mechanisms (temporal, spectral and phase coupling model hypothesis) of a specific study, as well as the expected coupling degree and conditions. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-022-09911-1.

Indexed as

EEGHyperscanningInter-brain couplingNeuroscience

Identifiers

PMID38406199
PMCPMC10881924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.