Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38406104›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Diagnostic Validation and Feasibility of a Non-invasive Haemoglobin Screening Device (EzeCheck) for 'Anaemia Mukt Bharat' in India.

Krushna Chandra Sahoo, Abhinav Sinha, Rakesh Kumar Sahoo, S Shradha Suman, Debdutta Bhattacharya, Sanghamitra Pati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Krushna Chandra SahooPublic Health, Health Technology Assessment in India, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - Regional Medical Research Centre (RMRC), Bhubaneswar, IND.
Abhinav SinhaPublic Health, Health Technology Assessment in India, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - Regional Medical Research Centre (RMRC), Bhubaneswar, IND.
Rakesh Kumar SahooPublic Health, Health Technology Assessment in India, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - Regional Medical Research Centre (RMRC), Bhubaneswar, IND.
S Shradha SumanPublic Health, Health Technology Assessment in India, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - Regional Medical Research Centre (RMRC), Bhubaneswar, IND.
Debdutta BhattacharyaMicrobiology, Health Technology Assessment in India, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - Regional Medical Research Centre (RMRC), Bhubaneswar, IND.
Sanghamitra PatiPublic Health, Health Technology Assessment in India, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - Regional Medical Research Centre (RMRC), Bhubaneswar, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaemia remains a major public health issue in India despite several efforts. It is crucial to introduce technology-based innovations for the mass screening and early diagnosis of anaemia. Traditional anaemia screening requires drawing blood and laboratory analysis and can be logistically expensive in resource-constrained settings. A non-invasive haemoglobin test for mass screening in such settings is vital which can quickly and efficiently screen large populations. This study validated the haemoglobin estimation between the invasive haematology analyzer and the non-invasive EzeCheck (EzeRx Health Tech Pvt. Ltd., Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India) in the community setting. We conducted a cross-sectional study among 416 urban slum members in Bhubaneswar, India. We used inter-rater reliability (kappa statistic) of haemoglobin estimation between the haematology analyzer and EzeCheck devices. The finding showed a moderate agreement between both devices (kappa=0.4221). Between both devices, 91.59% of the results were with +/-1.5 difference; 43.51%, no difference; 33.65%, less than one difference; and 14.42%, +/-1 to +/-1.5 difference of haemoglobin estimation. There was no significant difference in overall anaemia status estimates between the devices. Mass screening in schools and communities with non-invasive haemoglobin tests can help identify anaemic people for early diagnosis and bring patients for timely treatment, which can be used in remote areas to support 'Anaemia Mukt Bharat'.

Indexed as

anaemiahaemoglobinindianon-invasivepoint-of-care testing

Identifiers

PMID38406104
PMCPMC10894012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.