Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38406102›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Myocarditis: A Literature Review.

Rohail Gul, Muhammad Shehryar, Anber Mahboob, Hira K Kareem, Arslan Inayat, Danish Safi, Amir Kamran

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Rohail GulInternal Medicine, Shifa Tameer-E-Millat University Shifa College of Medicine, Islamabad, PAK.
Muhammad ShehryarInternal Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, PAK.
Anber MahboobInternal Medicine, Sharif Medical and Dental College, Lahore, PAK.
Hira K KareemInternal Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, PAK.
Arslan InayatInternal Medicine, HSHS St. Marys Hospital, Decatur, USA.
Danish SafiHematology and Medical Oncology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, USA.
Amir KamranHematology and Medical Oncology, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, USA.
CMH Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry · PKCharleston Area Medical Center · USKing Edward Medical University · PKShifa Tameer-e-Millat University · PKSt. Mary's Hospital · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently in the field of oncology, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are being increasingly utilized both in clinical trials and in clinical practice. It is a form of biological therapy that targets tumors by activating the immune system, which in turn eliminates proliferating cancer cells. These have numerous immune-related adverse events (irAEs), one of which is myocarditis, which has high rates of mortality. This article was a narrative review of myocarditis related to ICI use.  Studies from the PubMed, Cochrane, and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) databases were used in writing this review. The databases were searched for original publications for adverse effects related to ICI use and myocarditis specifically. There are numerous published instances of cancer immunotherapy causing myocarditis. ICI therapy has numerous benefits, as it upregulates the immune system to target cancer cells, utilizing the body's own defense mechanisms to target proliferating cells. Myocarditis is a serious side effect, however. Therefore, on balance, these monotherapies are worth using. While this literature review primarily identifies cross-reaction as the main mechanism of myocarditis, there are other possible mechanisms. One proposed mechanism involves a shared antigen between the myocardial tissue and the tumor. This mechanism is called molecular mimicry, where the monoclonal antibody attacks both the myocardial tissue and the tumor cell. Management of ICI-induced myocarditis has not been studied by randomized controlled trials or prospective studies, but based on previous case reports and case series it is mostly treated with steroids initially. An ICI rechallenge after temporary discontinuation appears conceivable in many cases, especially given its therapeutic effects, but only limited data are available on the safety of a rechallenge after an irAE. The lack of RCTs regarding rechallenge with an ICI after irAE, more so specifically about myocarditis, along with the overall results and the complexity involved in such cases once again emphasize the need to make decisions on an individual basis by a multidisciplinary expert working group. At the same time, the focus should also be on publishing more data as the need will grow along with the indications for ICI therapies.

Indexed as

checkpoint inhibitor therapyimmune-checkpoint inhibitor adverse effectsimmune therapy mediated myocarditismultiple myeloma treatmentreview

Identifiers

PMID38406102
PMCPMC10894055
OpenAlexW4391215683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.