ReviewCureus2024
Co-occurrence of Meningioma and Intracranial Aneurysm: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Managing Dual Intracranial Pathologies of a Ruptured ACA Aneurysm Presenting Concomitantly with a Large Anterior Fossa Meningioma: Illustrative Case with Operative Video and Literature Review.Journal of neurological surgery reports · 2026Article
- Effects of intraoperative hypercapnia on postoperative brain functional network connectivity and cognitive function in adult patients undergoing Clipping Intracranial Aneurysm.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Concomitant Intracranial Aneurysm Clipping and Meningioma Resection: Surgical Strategy and Considerations.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A complete understanding of the rare neurosurgical phenomenon of co-occurring meningioma and intracranial aneurysm is important to improve the quality of life and decrease future complications in these patients. In this review, we searched the literature for cases of this rare phenomenon to highlight the most important historical, investigation, and treatment-related factors to improve the accuracy of intraoperative procedural decisions. We searched the PubMed database for case reports on this neurological rare phenomenon to create organized data for our review. Then, we extracted information from these cases and organized it in a table. We identified 19 cases in the literature. In the published studies, there was a predominance of the female sex (73.68%). The mean age of the patients was 54.11 years, with the cases relatively evenly distributed among patients in their 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, and 70s. Posterior communicating artery aneurysm was the most common among the 19 cases. For meningioma, the frontal lobe and clinoid were the two most affected locations, and the meningothelial histopathology was the most common. Complete tumor resection and aneurysmal clipping were done for the majority of the cases (57.8%) unless there was a complication that deferred simultaneous intervention. Fortunately, most patients (78.95%) recovered completely after surgery. The coexistence of meningioma and intracranial aneurysm has a very high cure rate, postoperative symptom resolution, and a very low recurrence rate. For most cases, neuroimaging investigations are recommended for simultaneous management. This imaging can also highlight other potentially suspicious findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.