ArticleCureus2024
A Contemporary Review of Cryptorchidism Management in Adults: A Rare Presentation of Bilateral Cryptorchidism Presenting as Pelvic Pain in an Adult Patient.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case report presents a rare case of adult cryptorchidism, found incidentally in a 25-year-old gentleman who initially presented with abdominal and suprapubic pain and was successfully treated with staged orchidopexy. To our knowledge, to date, our case is the first published instance of bilateral cryptorchidism in an adult presenting with nonspecific suprapubic pain. Cryptorchidism is the most common genital abnormality in newborn boys, and due to its association with an increased risk of infertility and malignancy, current management involves surgical correction with orchidopexy by 12 to 18 months of life. Adult presentation of cryptorchidism is very unusual due to early intervention; therefore, bilateral cryptorchidism is even more rare. As a result, current guidelines do not address proper management for adult cryptorchidism. Therefore, after performing a thorough review of the literature on contemporary guidelines for cryptorchidism management, we aim to highlight our approach to management in this rare case of adult bilateral cryptorchidism. We suggest bilateral orchiectomy as the safest option, if the patient is amendable, or bilateral orchiopexy with long-term follow-up for testicular cancer. Although the American Urological Association guidelines recommend orchiectomy for postpubertal cryptorchid children, currently, no explicit guidelines exist for the preferred method of managing adult cryptorchidism. Due to the increased risk of infertility and testicular cancer with cryptorchidism, orchiectomy instead of orchiopexy may be the preferred surgical approach in some instances. Still, in the case of bilateral cryptorchidism, orchiectomy may not always be the most viable solution, making orchiopexy with long-term follow-up for testicular cancer the best option, such as in our case.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.