ArticleCureus2024
Paradoxical and Unmasking HIV Immune Reconstitution Inflammation Syndrome in Antiretroviral-Naïve Pregnant Women: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsFollowing antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation, HIV-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), indicated by an array of opportunistic infections, may occur, presenting as either paradoxical, a worsening of a previously treated infection, or unmasking, a flare-up of an underlying, previously undiagnosed infection. The impact of ART as the backbone of HIV treatment and prevention has prolonged the survival of people living with HIV. In pregnancy, benefits have been shown by slowing HIV progression and preventing perinatal transmission; however, there have been risks of adverse reactions with ART, including immune responses to both the fetus and mother. This study sought to estimate the incidence of HIV-IRIS cumulatively and by type either paradoxical or unmasking IRIS, determine the baseline maternal and HIV clinical markers as predictors of, and analyze the log-rank test for survival time to IRIS outcome assessed by relying on an increase in CD4 count and/or a rapid decrease in viral load.
methodsAn active records study was conducted between June 2019 and March 2020 among ART-naïve pregnant women attending the antenatal care units (ANCu) at the Kenyatta National and Mbagathi Hospitals, Nairobi, Kenya. Participants were aged between 20 and 49 years and had a confirmed HIV-positive test. To ascertain a true case of IRIS, the diagnosis was adjudicated for accuracy and consistency by an independent review committee. Plasma HIV viral load, CD4 counts, and routine laboratory evaluations (hemoglobin, white blood cell count (WBC)) were performed by each hospital's clinical laboratory. The IRIS incidence was assessed using the International Network for Studies Against HIV-Associated IRIS (INSHI) during the first three months after ART initiation. Multivariate Cox regression with IRIS as the outcome, using the SPSSSurvival package, examined the relationship between baseline maternal characteristics and HIV clinical markers before ART initiation and IRIS, and finally, decision-tree analysis for predicting IRIS was performed.
resultsFrom a pool of 532 ART-naïve pregnant women, 133 (25%) developed IRIS, and 97 (72.9%) were in the unmasking category. The accumulated risk of experiencing IRIS symptoms increased from week two (hazard ratio (HR)=0.0287) to week 12 (HR=3.6158). Participants with a maternal BMI (MBMI) of 25-29.9 kg/m
conclusionFor ART-naïve pregnant women, unmasking IRIS is the most common type, and an MBMI of 25-29.9 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.