ArticleCureus2024
The Examination of Prognostic Factors and Treatment Strategies for Traumatic Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction This study aimed to determine the optimal timing for surgical intervention and the prognostic factors of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. Methods We identified 25 patients with probable CSF leaks from 472 consecutive patients with head trauma. In addition to baseline characteristics and findings on admission, injury severity score (ISS), abbreviated injury score (AIS), and other factors related to CSF leakage were considered. We analyzed the prognostic factors after setting the primary endpoint as the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at the time of discharge to determine the appropriate timing for surgical intervention. Results Univariate analysis revealed significantly poorer prognoses for elderly patients (p<0.001) and cases with low Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) levels (p=0.039) and high D-dimer levels (p=0.028), which was consistent with findings from the analyses of all patients with head trauma. We found that multiple traumas (AIS≥3 at two or more sites, p=0.047) and high lactate levels (p=0.043) were poor prognostic factors specific to CSF leakage cases, while a longer time to CSF leakage cessation was also associated with a poorer prognosis (median, six days versus 13 days, p=0.014). An evaluation of the time to closure found that spontaneous cessation occurred within 14 days in most cases. Conclusions Conservative medical treatment is the first choice for most cases of traumatic CSF leakage. Surgical intervention should be considered if leakage does not cease after 14 days post injury. Furthermore, severe multiple injuries and high lactate levels were poor prognostic factors specific to patients with CSF leakage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.