Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38406013›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Medical Honey in Head and Neck Cancer.

Joel Badders, Orly Coblens, Viran Ranasinghe, Sepehr Shabani

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joel BaddersSchool of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA.
Orly CoblensOtolaryngology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA.
Viran RanasingheOtolaryngology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA.
Sepehr ShabaniOtolaryngology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA.
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical honey has been recognized for its medicinal properties for thousands of years, and several medical honey products have entered the market over the last two decades. In vitro studies have shown that honey has antimicrobial properties, protects against bacterial growth, and improves wound healing. However, these products are not widely used for wound treatment in head and neck surgery. Additionally, honey has been utilized in those undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) to treat radiation-induced mucositis. This literature review aims to describe and assess the utility of medical honey for patients undergoing treatment for HNC and thus review publications on medical honey for treating postoperative wounds and preventing radiation-induced mucositis. Ovid (Medicine), PubMed (Medline), and Google Scholar were searched using keywords related to medical honey and HNC. All abstracts retrieved in the search were screened for content relevance. Three randomized controlled trials on wound healing were reviewed and assigned a score using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for methodological quality. Three meta-analyses assessing radiation-induced mucositis were reviewed and evaluated. Using medical honey on postoperative wounds was associated with shorter hospital stays, faster healing of palatal graft defects, and reduced pigmentation of thyroidectomy scars. Medical honey had no impact on bacterial culture rates or other aesthetic measures. For patients undergoing radiation for HNC, orally ingested honey was associated with less weight loss and delayed the onset of severe radiation-induced mucositis. However, results across different meta-analyses were mixed. Minimal evidence supporting the use of honey in postoperative wounds for patients with HNC exists. However, the studies reviewed here, combined with in-vitro studies and studies in other anatomical regions, show honey may offer some wound healing benefits. More robust studies are needed to confirm the potential benefits of medical honey in the postoperative wounds of HNC patients. While radiation-induced mucositis continues to be a debilitating adverse effect of HNC treatment, the literature reviewed supports honey as a safe complementary therapy in preventing radiation-induced mucositis.

Indexed as

head and neck neoplasmsmedical honeypostoperative woundsradiation-induced mucositis­wound healing

Identifiers

PMID38406013
PMCPMC10884620
OpenAlexW4391150711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.