Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38405914›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Processing-bias correction with DEBIAS-M improves cross-study generalization of microbiome-based prediction models.

George I Austin, Aya Brown Kav, Heekuk Park, Jana Biermann, Anne-Catrin Uhlemann, Tal Korem

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

George I AustinDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7834-4968
Aya Brown KavProgram for Mathematical Genomics, Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2085-126X
Heekuk ParkDivision of Infectious Diseases, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5815-9717
Jana BiermannProgram for Mathematical Genomics, Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8907-4633
Anne-Catrin UhlemannDivision of Infectious Diseases, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9798-4768
Tal KoremProgram for Mathematical Genomics, Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0609-0858

Funding

Training in Biomedical Informatics at Columbia UniversityT15LM007079 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI NOEMIE ELHADAD, GEORGE M HRIPCSAK · 1992 to 2026
$28.9M
A large scale investigation of the vaginal metagenome and metabolome and their role in spontaneous preterm birthR01HD106017 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KOREM, TAL · 2021 to 2025
$3.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD106017NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Every step in common microbiome profiling protocols has variable efficiency for each microbe. For example, different DNA extraction kits may have different efficiency for Gram-positive and -negative bacteria. These variable efficiencies, combined with technical variation, create strong processing biases, which impede the identification of signals that are reproducible across studies and the development of generalizable and biologically interpretable prediction models. "Batch-correction" methods have been used to alleviate these issues computationally with some success. However, many make strong parametric assumptions which do not necessarily apply to microbiome data or processing biases, or require the use of an outcome variable, which risks overfitting. Lastly and importantly, existing transformations used to correct microbiome data are largely non-interpretable, and could, for example, introduce values to features that were initially mostly zeros. Altogether, processing bias currently compromises our ability to glean robust and generalizable biological insights from microbiome data. Here, we present DEBIAS-M (

Identifiers

PMID38405914
PMCPMC10888995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.